Cyclic Movement Training versus Conventional Physiotherapy for Rehabilitation of Hemiparetic Gait after Stroke: A Pilot Study

This would be a great improvement because I would be willing to bet that getting one of these would be much easier than one of the body-weight supported training. I think this refers to NuStep and similar.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21656459

[Article in German]

Podubecka J, Scheer S, Theilig S, Wiederer R, Oberhoffer R, Nowak DA.

Source

Neurologische Fachklinik, Klinik Kipfenberg.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recovery of impaired motor functions following stroke is commonly incomplete in spite of intensive rehabilitation programmes. At 6 months following a stroke up to 60 % of affected individuals still suffer from permanent motor deficits, in particular hemiparetic gait, that are relevant for daily life. Novel innovative therapeutic strategies are needed to enhance the recovery of impaired gait function following stroke.

METHOD:

This pilot study has investigated the effectiveness of conventional physiotherapy in comparison to an apparative cyclic movement training over a period of 4 weeks to improve (i) power during a submaximal cyclic movement training of the lower limbs, (ii) cardiac fitness, (iii) balance and gait ability, and (iv) quality of life in stroke patients.

RESULTS:

In comparison to physiotherapy apparative cyclic movement training improved power, balance, cardiac fitness and quality of life to a greater extent. However, there was a statistically significant difference between both intervention groups only for balance but not for the other parameters assessed.

CONCLUSION:

The present pilot study should inspire future research with larger patient cohorts to allow appropriate judgement on the effectiveness of apparative cyclic movement training in stroke rehabilitation.