Another question for your doctor. Its going to be hard to remember everything you need to tell your doctor right after your stroke so you better hope they are up-to-date.
http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120625/Intensive-insulin-may-backfire-in-acute-stroke.aspx
Intensive control of glucose levels in patients with hyperacute stroke may do more harm than good, results of the randomized INSULINFARCT trial suggest.
The researchers found that infarcts expanded more in patients given intravenous insulin treatment than in those given subcutaneous insulin, despite the intensive regimen providing enhanced glucose control.
Charlotte
Rosso (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France) and co-workers call
the results "disappointing," in view of previous data from animal
studies indicating that hyperglycemia contributes to infarct growth.
"We
have no explanation for this discrepancy between preclinical and
clinical data but they clearly indicate the need for a reappraisal of
the pathophysiological models of glucose energy metabolism alterations in the early phase of focal cerebral ischemia," the team writes in Stroke.
Intensive
insulin treatment (IIT), delivered intravenously from within 6 hours of
stroke symptom onset, resulted in excellent glucose control. In all,
95.4% of 87 patients in the IIT group had average insulin levels below 7
mmol/L over the first 24 hours of treatment, compared with 67.4% of 89
patients who received subcutaneous glucose.
Yet the average infarct growth on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) between baseline and days 1-3 was more than twice that in the than IIT glucose group, at 27.9 versus 10.8 cm3, from similar initial volumes of 11.4 and 10.5 cm3,
respectively. The time to initial DWI was nonsignificantly shorter in
the IIT than the subcutaneous glucose group, at 132 versus 157 minutes.
Patients'
longer-term outcomes were unaffected by insulin treatment, however. At 3
months after stroke, 45.6% of each group had good functional outcomes,
defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. In addition, 15.6% and
10.0% of the IIT and subcutaneous insulin
groups died, respectively, and 38.9% and 35.6%, respectively, had a
serious adverse event, defined as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage,
neurologic worsening, and any event that was life-threatening or
extended hospital stay.
No comments:
Post a Comment