Most of the commentators on this story refuse to believe in anything scientific.
Don't do it. No one even discusses whether chiropractic has any basis in science, subluxations anyone?
The chiropractic version of subluxation;
http://www.chiro.org/LINKS/subluxation.shtml
The reformed chiropractor version here;
http://quackfiles.blogspot.com/2004/09/elusive-chiropractic-subluxation.html
The health article here;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2156179/Letting-chiropractor-crack-neck-ease-pain-trigger-stroke.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
In a medical debate on bmj.com, experts argue the technique is ‘unnecessary and inadvisable’.
Researchers, writing in the British Medical Journal,
say the representatives of chiropractors and osteopaths should advise
their members the risks outweigh the benefits by too much to justify the
use of manipulation.
No comments:
Post a Comment