Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information?

What is your doctor doing with this for your protocol to better your memory? ANYTHING AT ALL?
Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information?

• Frédéric Roux¹,
• Peter J. Uhlhaas^{2, 3, 4,}

• ¹ BCBL, Basque Center for Cognition, Brain and Language, Paseo Mikeletegi 69, Donostia/San Sebastian, 20009, Spain
• ² Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow, G12 8QB, UK
• ³ Department of Neurophysiology, Max-Planck Institute for Brain Research, Deutschordenstrasse 46, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany
• ⁴ Ernst-Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience, in Cooperation with Max-Planck Society, Deutschordenstrasse 46, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany

Choose an option to locate/access this article:

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution

Check access

Purchase $37.95

• 

---

Highlights

•

We outline a framework for assigning distinct roles of theta/alpha/gamma-band oscillations to different WM-processes.

•

Gamma-band oscillations are actively involved in WM-maintenance.

•

Alpha-band activity underlies the inhibition of task-irrelevant activity.

•

Theta-band oscillations underlie the temporal organization of WM items.

•

Through cross-frequency coupling, alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes provide distinct mechanisms for different WM information.

---

Neural oscillations at different frequencies have recently been related to a wide range of basic and higher cognitive processes. One possible role of oscillatory activity is to assure the maintenance of information in working memory (WM). Here we review the possibility that rhythmic activity at theta, alpha, and gamma frequencies serve distinct functional roles during WM maintenance. Specifically, we propose that gamma-band oscillations are generically involved in the maintenance of WM information. By contrast, alpha-band activity reflects the active inhibition of task-irrelevant information, whereas theta-band oscillations underlie the organization of sequentially ordered WM items. Finally, we address the role of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) in enabling alpha–gamma and theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information.