Reasoning Training in the ACTIVE Study How Much Is Needed and Who Benefits?

One of the side effects of stroke is sometimes inability to reason and see your deficits.

I would think that stroke survivors should get this type of training. You do want better reasoning after stroke, don't you? Then ask your doctor for it because your doctor won't even know about this.

Reasoning Training in the ACTIVE Study How Much Is Needed and Who Benefits?

1. Sherry L. Willis, PhD1
2. Grace I. L. Caskie, PhD2

1. ¹University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
2. ²Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA

1. Sherry L. Willis, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington Medical School, 180 Nickerson St, Suite 260, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Email: oldage@u.washington.edu

Abstract

Objective: To characterize change through 5-year follow-up, associated with training, booster, adherence, and other characteristics. Methods: Sample included all individuals randomly assigned to reasoning training (N = 699). Piecewise latent growth modeling was used to examine trajectory of performance on outcome measures. Results: Training resulted in improved reasoning performance through Year 5. A significant third annual booster effect was one-half the size of the training effect. Training adherence resulted in greater training effects. Higher education, Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), better health, and younger age related to higher baseline performance. Higher MMSE was related to larger training effects, larger linear slopes, and smaller booster effects. Significant functional outcomes included a training effect for complex reaction time (CRT), and first annual booster effects for the CRT and observed tasks of daily living. Discussion: Initial training gain was comparable with magnitude of age-related cognitive decline over 5 years with no training. Neither age nor gender predicted training or booster effects, indicating the generality of training effects across age (65-90 years).