Motor recovery patterns in arm muscles: coupled bilateral training and neuromuscular stimulation

I have no idea how this could be applied but I'm sure in the  next week your therapist will have incorporated it into your stroke protocol.
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/57

Nyeonju Kang¹, Jerelyne Idica¹, Bhullar Amitoj¹ and James H Cauraugh^2*

• * Corresponding author: James H Cauraugh cauraugh@ufl.edu

Author Affiliations

¹ Motor Behavior Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
² Motor Behavior Laboratory, Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8206, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:57  doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-57

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/57

Received:	26 April 2013
Accepted:	1 April 2014
Published:	11 April 2014

© 2014 Kang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Formula display:

Abstract

Background

Neuromuscular stimulation coupled with bilateral movements facilitates functional motor recovery of the upper extremities post stroke. This study investigated electromyography activation patterns during training. The leading question asked: Do EMG activation patterns show rehabilitative effects of coupled bilateral movement training on wrist and fingers extension, elbow extension, and shoulder abduction?

Methods

Twelve stroke volunteers completed nine hours of coupled bilateral movement training on three sets of joints in their arms. Neuromuscular stimulation on the impaired limb assisted wrist and fingers extension, elbow extension, and shoulder abduction. Mean activation level data were analyzed in a three-way completely within-subjects ANOVA (Training Day × Movement Type × Trial Block: 3 × 3 × 3).

Results

The analysis revealed three important findings: (a) activation levels in Days 5 and 6 were significantly higher than Days 1 and 2, (b) muscle activation patterns increased across trial blocks, and (c) movements for the shoulder joint/girdle as well as wrist and fingers demonstrated higher activation than the elbow joint. Further analysis indicated that the muscle activation patterns for shoulder abduction were positively associated with force stabilization (ratio of good variability relative to bad variability) during bilateral force production.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that capability to increase muscle activity during the three joint movements was improved after training. There appears to be higher muscle activation in the primary proximal and distal muscles necessary for motor control improvement.