Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Endogenous neurogenesis following ischaemic brain injury: Insights for therapeutic strategies

Ask your doctor to create a translational research project with other doctors to figure out what the standard stroke protocol should be for this. They will not do this on their own. YOU have to initiate this and create the expectation that they will follow thru.
If we had a great stroke association it could be handed off to them and the project would get done. But we have press release stroke associations. I don't know how the boards of directors can live with themselves for such pathetic efforts.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1357272514002544
Choose an option to locate/access this article:
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution
Check access
 Show more

Abstract

Ischaemic stroke is among the most common yet most intractable types of central nervous system (CNS) injury in the adult human population. In the acute stages of disease, neurons in the ischaemic lesion rapidly die and other neuronal populations in the ischaemic penumbra are vulnerable to secondary injury. Multiple parallel approaches are being investigated to develop neuroprotective, reparative and regenerative strategies for the treatment of stroke. Accumulating evidence indicates that cerebral ischaemia initiates an endogenous regenerative response within the adult brain that potentiates adult neurogenesis from populations of neural stem and progenitor cells. A major research focus has been to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie the potentiation of adult neurogenesis and to appreciate how interventions designed to modulate these processes could enhance neural regeneration in the post-ischaemic brain. In this review, we highlight recent advances over the last 5 years that help unravel the cellular and molecular mechanisms that potentiate endogenous neurogenesis following cerebral ischaemia and are dissecting the functional importance of this regenerative mechanism following brain injury.
This article is part of a Directed Issue entitled: Regenerative Medicine: the challenge of translation.

Keywords

  • Stroke;
  • Neural stem cells;
  • Cell proliferation;
  • Brain repair;
  • Cell signalling
This article is part of a Directed Issue entitled: Regenerative Medicine: the challenge of translation.

Corresponding author at: Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Kenneth Myer Building, 30 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 90356535; fax: +61 3 86779826.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 99029622; fax: +61 3 99052766.
Note to users: Uncorrected proofs are Articles in Press that have been copy edited and formatted, but have not been finalized yet. They still need to be proof-read and corrected by the author(s) and the text could still change before final publication.
Although uncorrected proofs do not have all bibliographic details available yet, they can already be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI, as follows: author(s), article title, Publication (year), DOI. Please consult the journal's reference style for the exact appearance of these elements, abbreviation of journal names and use of punctuation.
When the final article is assigned to an volumes/issues of the Publication, the Article in Press version will be removed and the final version will appear in the associated published volumes/issues of the Publication. The date the article was first made available online will be carried over.

No comments:

Post a Comment