Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Mimics

This is absolutely appalling. There are  enough cases of misdiagnosis of stroke out there to conduct research on them. And they even do the wrong type of research. They should be studying why they misdiagnosed rather than seeing if what they did was bad. Doesn't anyone use the few remaining brain cells they have to determine the correct items to research? I really think everyone out there in the stroke medical world should be replaced by stroke survivors, we at least would solve the correct problems. This is because of the f*cking laziness of doing meta-analysis rather than original research and the total lack of data gathering by our stroke associations on strokes.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2015/03/19/STROKEAHA.115.009012.abstract?papetoc

Prospective 5-Year Study and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

1. Georgios Tsivgoulis, MD,
2. Ramin Zand, MD,
3. Aristeidis H. Katsanos, MD,
4. Nitin Goyal, MD,
5. Ken Uchino, MD,
6. Jason Chang, MD,
7. Efthimios Dardiotis, MD,
8. Jukka Putaala, MD,
9. Anne W. Alexandrov, PhD,
10. Marc D. Malkoff, MD and
11. Andrei V. Alexandrov, MD

+ Author Affiliations

1. From the Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis (G.T., R.Z., N.G., J.C., A.W.A., M.D.M., A.V.A.); Second Department of Neurology, “Attikon University Hospital,” School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece (G.T., A.H.K.); Department of Neurology, Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH (K.U.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece (E.D.); Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (J.P.); and College of Nursing, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (A.W.A.).

1. Correspondence to Georgios Tsivgoulis, MD, Second Department of Neurology, University of Athens, School of Medicine, Iras 39, Gerakas Attikis, Athens, Greece 15344. E-mail tsivgoulisgiorg@yahoo.gr

Abstract

Background and Purpose—Shortening door-to-needle time may lead to inadvertent intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) administration in stroke mimics (SMs). We sought to determine the safety of IVT in SMs using prospective, single-center data and by conducting a comprehensive meta-analysis of reported case-series.

Methods—We prospectively analyzed consecutive IVT-treated patients during a 5-year period at a tertiary care stroke center. A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-series reporting safety of IVT in SMs and confirmed acute ischemic stroke were conducted. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was defined as imaging evidence of ICH with an National Institutes of Health Stroke scale increase of ≥4 points. Favorable functional outcome at hospital discharge was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1.

Results—Of 516 consecutive IVT patients at our tertiary care center (50% men; mean age, 60±14 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke scale, 11; range, 3–22), SMs comprised 75 cases.(A 14.5% failure rate!!!) Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 1 patient, whereas we documented no cases of orolingual edema or major extracranial hemorrhagic complications. In meta-analysis of 9 studies (8942 IVT-treated patients), the pooled rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and orolingual edema among 392 patients with SM treated with IVT were 0.5% (95% confidence interval, 0%–2%) and 0.3% (95% confidence interval, 0%–2%), respectively. Patients with SM were found to have a significantly lower risk for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage compared with patients with acute ischemic stroke (risk ratio=0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.14–0.77; P=0.010), with no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias. Favorable functional outcome was almost 3-fold higher in patients with SM in comparison with patients with acute ischemic stroke (risk ratio=2.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.07–3.73; P<0.00001).