I'm sure that our stroke associations have not analyzed any longitudinal data and compared anything between studies. FAILURES ONCE AGAIN.
http://7thspace.com/headlines/511910/longitudinal_randomised_controlled_trials_in_rehabilitation_post_stroke_a_systematic_review_on_the_quality_of_reporting_and_use_of_baseline_outcome_values.html
The World Health Organisation stresses the need to collect high quality
longitudinal data on rehabilitation and to improve the comparability
between studies. This implies using all the information available and
transparent reporting.
We therefore investigated the quality of
reported or planned randomised controlled trials on rehabilitation
post-stroke with a repeated measure of physical functioning, provided
recommendations on the presentation of results using regression
parameters, and focused on the difficulties of adjustment for baseline
outcome measures.
Methods:
We performed a systematic review of the literature from 2011 to 2013 and
collected information on the way data was analysed. Moreover we
described various approaches to analyse the data using mixed models
illustrated with real data.
Results:
Eighty-four eligible studies were identified of which 61Â % (51/84) failed to analyse the data longitudinally.
Moreover, for 30Â % (25/83) the method for adjustment for baseline is
not known or not existent. Using real data we were able to show how much
difference in results an adjustment for baseline data can make.
We showed how to provide interpretable intervention effects using
regression coefficients while making use of all the information
available in the data.
Conclusions:
Our review showed that improvements were needed in the analysis of
longitudinal trials in rehabilitation post-stroke in order to maximise
the use of collected data and improve comparability between studies.
Reporting fully the method used (including baseline adjustment) and
using methods like mixed models could easily achieve this.
Author: Odile SauzetMaren KleineAnke Menzel-BegemannAnne-Kathrin Exner
Credits/Source: BMC Neurology 2015, 15:99
No comments:
Post a Comment