Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Does Action Observation Training With Immediate Physical Practice Improve Hemiparetic Upper-Limb Function in Chronic Stroke?

The answer once again is yes. When the FUCKING HELL is this going to be written up into a publicly available stroke protocol? I'm guessing never because we have totally craptastic stroke associations doing nothing for survivors. And this is for chronic.
http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/29/9/807?etoc
  1. Kita Sugg1
  2. Sean Müller, PhD1
  3. Carolee Winstein, PhD2
  4. David Hathorn3
  5. Alasdair Dempsey, PhD1
  1. 1Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
  2. 2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  3. 3Western Australian Neuroscience Research Institute (WANRI), Perth, Australia
  1. Sean Müller, PhD, School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia. Email: s.muller@murdoch.edu.au

Abstract

Background. The mirror neuron network provides a neural mechanism to prime the motor system through action observation in stroke survivors. 
Objective. To examine whether action observation training with immediate physical practice improves upper-limb function in chronic stroke.  
Methods. In a within-subject design, 14 chronic stroke survivors were assessed at baseline, then participated in 2 weeks of relaxation-sham plus physical practice (control) and reassessed. Thereafter, they participated in 2 weeks of action observation training coupled with immediate physical practice (intervention), followed by a final assessment. Duration of each action observation video sequence (priming exposure) was 30 s followed immediately by practice of the observed motor skill. Results. There were significant improvements in control and intervention phases on primary outcome measures—Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) and Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity (FTHUE)—as well as secondary outcome measures of self-perceptions of arm use. Gains in the primary outcomes were greater during the intervention phase (action observation + physical practice; FMA, 10.64; FTHUE level, 0.79, and tasks, 1.57) than during the control phase (relaxation-sham plus physical practice; FMA, 6.64; FTHUE level, 0.43, and tasks, 1.00). Interviews with participants highlighted the added value of watching an actor perform the movement before physically attempting to perform the action.  
Conclusions. This study provides preliminary evidence of the additive value of action observation plus physical practice over relaxation-sham plus physical practice. There appears to be capacity for further recovery of upper-limb function in chronic stroke that persists at least in the short term.

No comments:

Post a Comment