Fewer Cardiovascular Drugs Being Studied in Clinical Trials

We have absolutely no clue what clinical trials are out there for stroke, our fucking failures of stroke associations seem to have no clue and don't care. Why should they care? They aren't running the strategy or leadership. They stick to the easy crap; press releases on prevention and F.A.S.T. Almost impossible to get any more incompetent that that.
http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=167285&CultureCode=en
The number of cardiovascular drugs in the research pipeline has declined across all phases of development in the last 20 years even as cardiovascular disease has become  the number one cause of death world-wide, according to research published today in JACC: Basic to Translational Science.
While the development and use of new prescription drugs have been associated with significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality over the past two decades, cardiovascular disease is still the leading cause of death in the developing world and accounts for 1 in 3 deaths in the United States. There has been growing concern over the decline in the development of new therapies.
Researchers analyzed data from a large commercial database of drug development activity, which tracks the pipeline of pharmaceutical research and development projects. The study included all products that had entered Phase 1 clinical trials between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2012, and focused on drugs intended to treat cardiovascular disorders.
During the trial period, 347 cardiovascular drugs entered Phase 1 testing, with the most common types being antihypertensive agents, lipid-lowering agents and anticoagulants. The number of cardiovascular drugs entering clinical trials in all stages of development declined over time. Between 1990 and 1995, 108 of 679 (16 percent) of Phase 1 trials were initiated for cardiovascular drugs, compared to 125 of 2,366 (5 percent) of Phase 1 trials between 2005 and 2012. Cardiovascular drugs accounted for 21 percent of Phase 3 trials in 1990 but only 7 percent in 2012. In comparison, the number of cancer drugs increased over the same time period.
“These findings shed light on several important shifts in cardiovascular research and development activity over the past two decades. Importantly, while the overall number of new investigational cardiovascular drugs has declined, we also found a relative growth in the number of drugs targeting novel biological pathways ,” said Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., associate professor of medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School and the senior author of the study.
Half of cardiovascular drugs entering Phase 3 trials targeted a novel biological pathway, or one for which the FDA had not yet approved a therapeutic agent. The rate of novel drugs entering Phase 3 increased from 27 percent in 1990-1991 to 57 percent in 2012.
While the development of most cardiovascular drugs was sponsored by large pharmaceutical companies, the number sponsored by small and medium-sized companies grew over time.
“These findings are not entirely glass-half empty,” said Douglas L. Mann, M.D., FACC, editor-in-chief of JACC: Basic to Translational Science. “Part of the decline in new drugs is that there are less ‘me too’ drugs that are similar to those already available. The study also refutes the premise that cardiovascular drugs are often riskier to develop than drugs in other clinical categories.”
In an editorial comment accompanying the study, Mona Fiuzat, PharmD, FACC and colleagues from the FDA emphasize the need for more translational basic research to identify new drug targets and the need to develop better strategies to identify successful drug candidates in Phase 2.
“Because drug development follows science, continued investment in the basic biology of cardiovascular disease is needed, and because large populations are impacted, attention to improved efficiency of the evidence generation system will be needed to generate needed sample sizes for definitive trials at a lower cost,” they said. “Finally, involving the full community including industry, the National Institutes of Health, academic experts, funding agencies, regulators, practitioners, and patients will be an important step in strengthening the science and advancing the field.”
Full bibliographic informationTemporal Trends and Factors Associated With Cardiovascular Drug Development, 1990 to 2012

Thomas J. Hwang, AB, Julie C. Lauffenburger, PHARMD, PHD, Jessica M. Franklin, PHD, Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH