How active are patients in setting goals during rehabilitation after stroke? A qualitative study of clinician perceptions

I bet the stroke medical professionals are subtly telling their patients not to expect 100% recovery. If so, that is medical malpractice. What the fuck is so godamned hard about setting goals? It will always be 100% recovery.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638288.2016.1253115?journalCode=idre20

John G. M. Parsons, Sarah E. Plant, Julia Slark & Sarah F. Tyson

Pages 1-8 | Received 17 Jun 2016, Accepted 23 Oct 2016, Published online: 20 Nov 2016

• Download citation
• http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1253115
• Crossmark

 

Select Language​▼

Translator disclaimer

• 
  

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated stroke rehabilitation clinician’s perceptions of the patient as an active partner in setting goals within stroke rehabilitation and factors that influence patient engagement.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews, subject to general inductive analysis with 20 Clinicians’ working in three UK based stroke rehabilitation teams (one in-patient ward and two community based rehabilitation teams).
Results: There were three key themes that impacted on the patients active involvement in setting goals for rehabilitation after stroke: Patient barriers to goal setting (knowledge of the patient and family, who is the patient and the stroke’s impact); How we work as a team (the role of the patient in setting goals, the effect of clinician attributes on goal setting); and How systems impact goal setting (goal-setting practice, home versus hospital, and professional/funder expectations of clinicians’).
Conclusions: Goal setting served a range of different, sometimes conflicting, functions within rehabilitation. Clinicians’ identified the integral nature of goals to engage and motivate patients and to provide direction and purpose for rehabilitation. Further, there was an identified need to consider the impact of prioritizing clinician-derived goals at the expense of patient-identified goals. Lastly the reliance on the SMART goal format requires further consideration, both in terms of the proposed benefits and whether they disempower the patient during rehabilitation.

• Implications for rehabilitation
• Goal setting is often promoted as a relatively simple, straightforward way to structure interactions with patients
• Patient-related factors together with resourcing constraints are significant barriers to patient-centered goal setting, particularly during inpatient rehabilitation
• Clinicians need to have pragmatic tools that can be integrated into practice to ensure that goal-setting practice can be maximized for patients with different intrinsic characteristics