I don't see how anything learned here can get stroke survivors a better recovery.
http://search.naric.com/research/rehab/redesign_record.cfm?search=2&type=all&criteria=J75364&phrase=no&rec=132793&article_source=Rehab&international=0&international_language=&international_location=
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
, Volume 98(2)
, Pgs. 368-380.
NARIC Accession Number: J75364. What's this?
ISSN: 0003-9993.
Author(s): Kristensen, Otto H.; Stenager, Egon; Dalgas, Ulrik.
Publication Year: 2017.
Number of Pages: 13.
Abstract: Study systematically evaluated (1) the
psychometric properties of criterion isokinetic dynamometry testing of
muscle strength in people with poststroke hemiplegia and (2) the
literature comparing muscle strength in patients poststroke with that in
healthy controls assessed by criterion isokinetic dynamometry. From a
systematic literature search of 7 databases, 20 studies covering 316
people with poststroke hemiplegia were included. The psychometric
properties of isokinetic dynamometry were reviewed with respect to
reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Furthermore, comparisons of
strength between paretic, nonparetic, and comparable healthy muscles
were reviewed. High intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) inter- and
intrasession reliability was reported for isokinetic dynamometry, which
was independent of the tested muscle group, contraction mode, and
contraction velocity. Slightly higher ICC values were found for the
nonparetic extremity. Standard error of the mean (SEM) values showed
that a change of 7 to 20 percent was required for a real group change to
take place for most muscle groups, with the knee extensors showing the
smallest SEM percentage values. The muscle strength of paretic muscles
showed deficits when compared with both healthy and nonparetic muscles,
independent of muscle group, contraction mode, and contraction velocity.
Nonparetic muscles only showed minor strength impairments when compared
with healthy muscles. Criterion isokinetic dynamometry is a reliable
test in peoples with stroke, generally showing marked reductions in
muscle strength of paretic and, to a lesser degree, nonparetic muscles
when compared with healthy controls, independent of muscle group,
contraction mode, and contraction velocity.
Descriptor Terms: HEMIPLEGIA, LITERATURE REVIEWS, MEASUREMENTS, MUSCULAR IMPAIRMENTS, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, STROKE, TESTS.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Kristensen, Otto H., Stenager, Egon, Dalgas, Ulrik. (2017). Muscle strength and poststroke hemiplegia: A systematic review of muscle strength assessment and muscle strength impairment.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
, 98(2), Pgs. 368-380. Retrieved 3/10/2017, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment