Neurofeedback as a form of cognitive rehabilitation therapy following stroke: A systematic review

Proving once again the incompetence out there in stroke/TBI that a review needs to be done at all. There should be a publicly available database of brain research and protocols updated each time something new comes in. These reviews and meta-analysis are fucking wastes of time getting in the way of actually solving all the problems in stroke.
http://search.naric.com/research/rehab/redesign_record.cfm?search=2&type=all&criteria=J76642&phrase=no&rec=134526&article_source=Rehab&international=0&international_language=&international_location=
PLoS One , Volume 12(5) , Pgs. e0177290.

NARIC Accession Number: J76642.  What's this?
ISSN: 1932-6203.
Author(s): Renton, Tian; Tibbles, Alana; Topolovec-Vranic, Jane.
Publication Year: 2017.
Number of Pages: 17.
Abstract: This systematic review examined the strength and quality of evidence to support the use of neurofeedback therapy (NFT) as a form of cognitive rehabilitation therapy to treat cognitive deficits following stroke. NFT targets the brain and cognitive functions through the use of electroencephalography (EEG), hence neurofeedback is sometimes referred to as EEG biofeedback. Searches for relevant literature were conducted using OVID (Medline, Health Star, Embase + Embase Classic) and PubMed databases. Additional searches were completed using the Cochrane Reviews library database, Google Scholar, the University of Toronto online library catalogue, ClinicalTrials.gov website and select journals. All searches were completed Feb/March 2015 and updated in June/July/Aug 2015. Eight studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. NFT protocols were highly specific and varied within each study. The majority of studies identified improvements in participant cognitive deficits following the initiation of therapy. Reviewers assessed study quality using the Downs and Black Checklist for Measuring Study Quality tool; limited study quality and strength of evidence restricted generalizability of conclusions regarding the use of this therapy to the greater stroke population. The findings suggest that progression in this field requires further inquiry to strengthen methodology quality and study design. Future investigations should aim to standardize NFT protocols in an effort to understand the dose-response relationship between NFT and improvements in functional outcome. Future investigations should also place a large emphasis on long-term participant follow-up.
Descriptor Terms: BIOFEEDBACK, BRAIN, COGNITIVE DISABILITIES, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, LITERATURE REVIEWS, OUTCOMES, REHABILITATION SERVICES, RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, STROKE.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Get this Document: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177290.

Citation: Renton, Tian, Tibbles, Alana, Topolovec-Vranic, Jane. (2017). Neurofeedback as a form of cognitive rehabilitation therapy following stroke: A systematic review.  PLoS One , 12(5), Pgs. e0177290. Retrieved 10/11/2017, from REHABDATA database.