So prior to this our medical teams were completely blind in cognitive testing post stroke. Aren't you glad you were a guinea pig in your doctors unregistered research? I bet your doctor provided your results to no one.
https://search.naric.com/research/rehab/redesign_record.cfm?search=2&type=all&criteria=J77631&phrase=no&rec=135597&article_source=Rehab&international=0&international_language=&international_location=
Rehabilitation Psychology
, Volume 62(4)
, Pgs. 443-454.
NARIC Accession Number: J77631. What's this?
ISSN: 0090-5550.
Author(s): Carlozzi, Noelle E; Tulsky, David S.; Wolf, Timothy J.; Goodnight, Siera.; Heaton, Robert K.; Casaletto, Kaitlin B.; Wong, Alex W. K; Baum, Carolyn; Gershon, Richard C.; Heinemann, Allen W..
Project Number:
90RT5008 (formerly H133B090024).
Publication Year: 2017.
Number of Pages: 12.
Abstract: Study evaluated the construct validity of
the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox (NIHTB) for the
Assessment of Behavior and Neurological Function Cognition Battery
(NIHTB-CB) in individuals with stroke. The NIHTB-CB provides a brief
assessment (approximately 30 minutes) of key components of cognition. A
total of 131 individuals with stroke (71 with mild stroke; 60 with
moderate/severe stroke) completed the NIHTB-CB. Univariate analyses were
conducted to examine the cognitive profiles of the two different stroke
groups (mild versus moderate/severe stroke) on NIHTB-CB measures and
composite scores. Pearson correlations were computed to evaluate
relationships between NIHTB-CB and established measures to examine
convergent and discriminant validity. Effect sizes and clinical
impairment rates for the different NIHTB-CB measures and composite
scores were also examined. Participants experiencing moderate-to-severe
stroke had poorer performance than did individuals with mild stroke on
several of the NIHTB cognition measures. Evidence of convergent validity
was provided by moderate-to-strong correlations between the NIHTB
measures and the corresponding standard neuropsychological test (Pearson
correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31 to 0.88). Evidence of
discriminant validity was provided by smaller correlations between
different cognitive domains than correlations of measures within the
same domain. Effect sizes for composite and subtest scores regarding
stroke severity were generally moderate-to-large. In addition, 42
percent of the sample were exhibiting mild cognitive impairment (i.e.,
≥2 low scores on fluid tests). Findings provide support for the
construct validity of the NIHTB-CB in individuals with stroke.
Descriptor Terms: COGNITION, MEASUREMENTS, OUTCOMES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, PROGRAM EVALUATION, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Carlozzi, Noelle E, Tulsky, David S.,
Wolf, Timothy J., Goodnight, Siera., Heaton, Robert K., Casaletto,
Kaitlin B., Wong, Alex W. K, Baum, Carolyn, Gershon, Richard C.,
Heinemann, Allen W.. (2017). Construct validity of the NIH toolbox cognition battery in individuals with stroke.
Rehabilitation Psychology
, 62(4), Pgs. 443-454. Retrieved 2/21/2018, from REHABDATA database.
No comments:
Post a Comment