Abstract
Despite
the exponential growth in the evidence base for stroke rehabilitation,
there is still a paucity of knowledge about how to consistently and
sustainably deliver evidence-based stroke rehabilitation therapies in
clinical practice. This means that people with stroke will not
consistently benefit from research breakthroughs, simply because
clinicians do not always have the skills, authority, knowledge or
resources to be able to translate the findings from a research trial and
apply these in clinical practice. This “point of view” article by an
interdisciplinary, international team illustrates the lack of available
evidence to guide the translation of evidence to practice in
rehabilitation, by presenting a comprehensive and systematic content
analysis of articles that were published in 2016 in leading clinical
stroke rehabilitation journals commonly read by clinicians. Our review
confirms that only a small fraction (2.5%) of published stroke
rehabilitation research in these journals evaluate the implementation of
evidence-based interventions into health care practice. We argue that
in order for stroke rehabilitation research to contribute to enhanced
health and well-being of people with stroke, journals, funders, policy
makers, researchers, clinicians, and professional associations alike
need to actively support and promote (through funding, conducting, or
disseminating) implementation and evaluation research.
No comments:
Post a Comment