The effect of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke—protocol for a systematic review

They have this point of stroke rehab being to optimise function instead of 100% recovery. Totally wrong point of stroke rehab. That tyranny of low expectations needs to stop. 

The effect of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke—protocol for a systematic review

• Mark P. McGlincheyEmail authorView ORCID ID profile,
• Jimmy James,
• Christopher McKevitt,
• Abdel Douiri,
• Sarah McLachlan and
• Catherine M. Sackley

Systematic Reviews20187:197

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0870-y

©  The Author(s). 2018

• Received: 5 May 2018
• Accepted: 2 November 2018
• Published: 17 November 2018

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Stroke rehabilitation aims to optimise function and reduce complications post-stroke. Rehabilitation to optimise physical function post-stroke has beneficial effects for survivors of mild to moderate stroke. However, little is known about the effectiveness of interventions to rehabilitate physical function or manage immobility-related complications for survivors of severe stroke. The systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke and identify topics for future research in this area.

Methods

A systematic review of relevant electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, DORIS and CENTRAL) between January 1987 and July 2017 will be undertaken to identify eligible published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in any language. Ongoing RCTs will be identified by searching health-care trial registers (Stroke Trials Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov). Hand searches of identified study reference lists will also be performed. The PRISMA statement will be used to guide the systematic review. Two reviewers will screen search results, select studies using pre-defined selection criteria, extract data from and assess risk of bias for selected studies. Studies comparing the effect of one type of rehabilitation intervention to another or usual care on physical function and immobility-related complications for patients with severe stroke will be included. Studies may include participants with all levels of stroke severity but must provide sub-group analysis based on stroke severity. Studies will focus on any phase of the stroke rehabilitation pathway and will be grouped and analysed according to their timeframe post-stroke into acute and early sub-acute (up to 3 months post-stroke), early sub-acute to late sub-acute (from 3 to 6 months post-stroke) and chronic (greater than 6 months post-stroke). If sufficient studies demonstrate homogeneity, a meta-analysis will pool results of individual outcomes. The GRADE approach will be used to assess the evidence strength.

Discussion

The results of this systematic review will summarise the strength of evidence for rehabilitation interventions used in the rehabilitation of physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke and identify gaps in evidence.

Systematic review registration

The systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)—registration number CRD77737.