Bad research, NDT/Bobath is not an effective treatment. Why are we comparing to this?
Comparison Of Two Physiotherapy Approaches InAcute Stroke Rehabilitation: Motor Relearning Program Versus Bobath Approach.
Motor Relearning Program vs. Bobath:
http://cre.sagepub.com/content/14/4/361.short
And here is Peter Levines take on NDT:
http://recoverfromstroke.blogspot.com/2013/01/neuro-developmental-treatment.html
The Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Training Using Rehabilitation Tools on the Upper-Extremity Functions and Daily Activities of Patients with Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
Abstract
Objectives
The
purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of task-oriented
circuit training (TOCT) using the rehabilitation tools for upper
extremity function upon the daily life of patients with acute stroke.
Methods
Eighteen
patients with acute stroke were randomly allocated into either the
experimental group or the control group. The experimental group
performed the TOCT program using rehabilitation tools, whilst the
control group had neuro-developmental treatment. Both groups received 30
minutes of treatment per session, 5~6 times per week, for 4 weeks. The
assessments conducted were the Fugl-Meyer assessment, motor activity log
and stroke impact scale to compare the upper extremity function and
activities of daily living.
Results
The
results showed a significant improvement in the TOCT group compared
with the neuro-developmental treatment group in the amount of motor
activity use and high stroke impact score, indicating recovery (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
The TOCT program using rehabilitation tools could have a positive impact on acute stroke patients use of their upper extremity.
No comments:
Post a Comment