Abstract
Stroke
is a major health burden as it is a leading cause of morbidity and
mortality worldwide. Blood flow restoration, through thrombolysis or
endovascular thrombectomy, is the only effective treatment but is
restricted to a limited proportion of patients due to time window
constraint and accessibility to technology. Over the past two decades,
research has investigated the basic mechanisms that lead to neuronal
death following cerebral ischemia. However, the use of neuroprotective
paradigms in stroke has been marked by failure in translation from
experimental research to clinical practice. In the past few years, much
attention has focused on the immune response to acute cerebral ischemia
as a major factor to the development of brain lesions and neurological
deficits. Key inflammatory processes after stroke include the activation
of resident glial cells as well as the invasion of circulating
leukocytes. Recent research on anti-inflammatory strategies for stroke
has focused on limiting the transendothelial migration of peripheral
immune cells from the compromised vasculature into the brain parenchyma.
However, recent trials testing the blockage of cerebral leukocyte
infiltration in patients reported inconsistent results. This emphasizes
the need to better scrutinize how immune cells are regulated at the
blood–brain interface and enter the brain parenchyma, and particularly
to also consider alternative cerebral infiltration routes for
leukocytes, including the meninges and the choroid plexus. Understanding
how immune cells migrate to the brain via these alternative pathways has the potential to develop more effective approaches for anti-inflammatory stroke therapies.
No comments:
Post a Comment