Friday, May 3, 2019

Extending the time window for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke using magnetic resonance imaging-based patient selection

But is it still a fucking failure because nothing they are doing will get you 100% recovered? Or will they justify their failures by using the tyranny of low expectations?  Ask them how them live with themselves for such incompetence?  I take no prisoners in trying to get stroke solved. Ph.D's are not exempt from incompetence and laziness.

Extending the time window for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke using magnetic resonance imaging-based patient selection

First Published April 4, 2019 Research Article

Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase within a time window up to 4.5 h is the only approved pharmacological treatment for acute ischemic stroke. We studied whether acute ischemic stroke patients with penumbral tissue identified on magnetic resonance imaging 4.5–9 h after symptom onset benefit from intravenous thrombolysis compared to placebo.
Acute ischemic stroke patients with salvageable brain tissue identified on a magnetic resonance imaging were randomly assigned to receive standard dose alteplase or placebo. The primary end point

(totally wrong endpoint, 100% recovery is the ONLY endpoint. Are you that dense?)

was disability at 90 days assessed by the modified Rankin scale, which has a range of 0–6 (with 0 indicating no symptoms at all and 6 indicating death). Safety end points included death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and other serious adverse events.
The trial was stopped early for slow recruitment after the enrollment of 119 (61 alteplase, 58 placebo) of 264 patients planned. Median time to intravenous thrombolysis was 7 h 42 min. The primary endpoint showed no significant difference in the modified Rankin scale distribution at day 90 (odds ratio alteplase versus placebo, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.63–2.27, P = 0.58). One symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in the alteplase group. Mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly between the two groups (11.5 and 6.8%, respectively; P = 0.53).

Intravenous alteplase administered between 4.5 and 9 h after the onset of symptoms in patients with salvageable tissue did not result in a significant benefit over placebo. (Supported by Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany; ISRCTN 71616222).

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing Articles: 0
 

No comments:

Post a Comment