Sunday, June 30, 2019

Frequency of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Post-Endovascular Therapy and Multiple Thrombectomy Passes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

And why is blood brain barrier disruption being attributed to multiple passes rather than this? Inflammatory action leaking through the blood brain barrier of the neuronal cascade of death.

Multiple passes just means there is more time for that inflammatory action to occur. Bad conclusion, and the mentors and senior researchers didn't catch this and correct it? I take no prisoners in trying to get stroke to be fixed. Firings would occur under my watch. 

Oops, I'm not playing by the polite rules of Dale Carnegie,  'How to Win Friends and Influence People'. 
Politeness will never solve anything in stroke.  I call them as I see them.

 

 

Frequency of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Post-Endovascular Therapy and Multiple Thrombectomy Passes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025914Stroke. ;0

Background and Purpose—

The high prevalence of hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) seen after endovascular therapy is suggestive of blood-brain barrier disruption and hemorrhage risk and may be attributable to multiple thrombectomy passes needed to achieve recanalization.

Methods—

Patients with acute stroke were included if they were screened from January 2015 through February 2019, received an acute ischemic stroke diagnosis involving the anterior circulation, treated with or without IV tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator), consented to the NINDS Natural History Study, and imaged with a baseline magnetic resonance imaging before receiving endovascular therapy. Consensus image reads for HARM and hemorrhagic transformation were performed. Good clinical outcome was defined as 0–2 using the latest available modified Rankin Scale score.

Results—

Eighty patients met all study criteria and were included in the analyses. Median age was 65 years, 64% female, 51% black/African American, median admit National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale=19, 56% treated with IV tPA, and 84% achieved Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3. Multiple-pass patients had significantly higher rates of severe HARM at 24 hours (67% versus 29%; P=0.001), any hemorrhagic transformation (60% versus 36%; P=0.04) and poor clinical outcome (67% versus 36%; P=0.008). Only age (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; P=0.022) and severe HARM at 24 hours post-endovascular therapy were significantly associated with multiple passes (odds ratio, 7.2; 95% CI, 1.93–26.92; P=0.003).

Conclusions—

In this exploratory study, multiple thrombectomy passes are independently associated with a significant increase in blood-brain barrier disruption detected at 24 hours. Patients with HARM post-endovascular therapy had a >7-fold increase in the odds of having multiple- versus single-pass thrombectomy.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00009243.

Footnotes

Presented in part at the International Stroke Conference, Honolulu, HI, February 6–8, 2019.
Correspondence to Marie Luby, PhD, Stroke Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Room B1D-733, MSC 1063, Bethesda, MD 20892–1063. Email

No comments:

Post a Comment