Identification of neuromuscular targets for restoration of walking ability after stroke: Precursor to precision rehabilitation

I don't think I was ever on an exercise bike at hospital. When I went to the 'Y' on my own I needed a strap on my left foot holding it to the pedal due to my spasticity.  With no effective use of my left hand to reach down and tighten the strap after I got on I couldn't go all out on the bike. 

Identification of neuromuscular targets for restoration of walking ability after stroke: Precursor to precision rehabilitation

Nicola J. Hancock

Lee Shepstone

Philip Rowe

Valerie M. Pomeroy

First published: 23 November 2019

https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1816

Read the full text

PDF

Tools

Share

Abstract

Objectives

Restoration of walking is a priority for stroke survivors and key target for physical therapies. Upright pedalling (UP) can provide functional walking‐like activity using a variety of muscle synergies; it is unclear which synergies might be most useful for recovery of walking. Objectives here were as follows:

• to examine whether neuromuscular measures derived during UP might identify targets for walking rehabilitation after stroke and
• to determine test–retest repeatability and concurrent validity of the measures.

Design

This was a prospective correlational study.

Setting

The study was carried out in a movement science laboratory.

Participants

The participants were 18 adults with stroke (StrS) and 10 healthy older adults (HOA).

Intervention/measurement

StrS and HOA took part in two identical measurement sessions. During UP, surface electromyography and kinematic data were recorded and then processed to derive three measures:

• reciprocal activity of quadriceps and hamstrings;
• percentage muscle activity “on” according to crank angle; and
• smoothness of movement.

Results

HOA and StrS demonstrated differences in reciprocal muscle activity (p = .044) and quadriceps activity according to crank angle (p = .034) but pedalled similarly smoothly (p = .367). For muscle activation according to crank angle in StrS, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval) showing acceptable repeatability were 0.46 [0.32, 0.58] affected quadriceps; 0.43 [0.28, 0.56] affected hamstrings; and 0.67 [0.56, 0.75] unaffected quadriceps.

Conclusion

Muscle activation according to crank angle is a promising measure of lower limb impairment during functional activity after stroke; subsequent investigation should determine magnitude of variance between testing sessions. Reciprocal activity of quadriceps and hamstrings muscles and quadriceps activity according to crank angle are both potential targets for physical therapies to improve motor recovery. Further investigations are warranted.