Ankle–foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance using spring-cam mechanism increases knee flexion in the swing phase during walking in stroke patients with hemiplegia

A readable article on it here:

Putting Spring-cam Back Into Stroke Patients Steps

But is it better than either of these two? Your doctor has some comparisons to do.

Spring-based wearable device could help those with certain neurological conditions walk again - Kickstart

World’s first ‘bionic knee brace’ returns energy to your joints to boost leg strength

 

The research article here:

Ankle–foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance using spring-cam mechanism increases knee flexion in the swing phase during walking in stroke patients with hemiplegia

Author links open overlay panelYusukeSekiguchi^a

DaiOwaki^bKeitaHonda^aKenichiroFukushi^cNoriyoshiHiroi^cTakeoNozaki^cShin-ichiIzumi^ad

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.029Get rights and content

Highlights

•

Newly developed spring-cam mechanism (CAM) produces ankle dorsiflexion resistance.

•

CAM was added to AFO with plantarflexion resistance mechanism (AFO-P).

•

The AFO-P with CAM (AFO-PCAM) had dorsiflexion and plantarflexion resistance.

•

Effect of the AFO-PCAM on gait kinematics in hemiplegic patients was examined.

•

The AFO-PCAM increased knee flexion in swing during gait in hemiplegic patients.

Abstract

Background

Ankle–foot orthoses with plantarflexion resistance (AFO-Ps) improve knee flexion in the stance phase on the paretic side in patients with hemiparesis. However, AFO-Ps decrease ankle power generation in the late stance phase and do not improve the knee flexion in the swing phase based on insufficient push-off at the late stance, resulting in lower toe clearance.

Research question

This study sought to investigate the effect of an AFO with dorsiflexion resistance, which was implemented by our developed device with spring–cam mechanism attached to the AFO-P (Gait Solution; Pacific Supply Co., Ltd., Japan), on kinetics and kinematics in the lower limb during gait in patients with hemiparesis.

Methods

Eleven patients with hemiparesis due to stroke walked on a 7-m walkway at a self-selected comfortable pace in the following conditions: (a) walking using the AFO-P with the proposed device with a spring–cam mechanism (AFO-PCAM), (b) walking using the AFO-P without our device (AFO-P), and (c) walking using no device (barefoot condition). Gait kinematics and kinetics were collected using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and four ground-reaction force plates. Changes in all parameters from the barefoot to AFO-PCAM and AFO-P conditions were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

In the AFO-PCAM condition, decrease in the maximum ankle power generation in the late-stance phase was significantly smaller than that in the AFO-P condition (p = 0.041). We noted a significant higher change in knee flexion in the paretic swing phase in the AFO-PCAM condition relative to that in the AFO-P condition (p = 0.016). The effect size for the comparisons of change was large (r ≧ 0.5).

Significance

Our device facilitated the realization of the ankle plantarflexion power in the late-stance phase because of dorsiflexion resistance, increasing the knee flexion angle during the swing phase.