The impact of wheelchair propulsion based physical activity on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a multicenter observational study

  But I see absolutely nothing here that suggests that lever powered wheelchairs were used. So not even using the best recovery options. I would velcro the hands to the handles. The mentors and senior researchers should have insisted on using lever wheelchairs. The ability to use a regular wheelchair means you are already high functioning so your conclusion is not supported.

• lever wheelchair (8 posts to May 2016)

• rowing wheelchair (5 posts to May 2016)

The impact of wheelchair propulsion based physical activity on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a multicenter observational study

Yosuke Kimura , Shunsuke Ohji , Naohito Nishio , Yuki Abe , Hideyuki Ogawa , Ryota Taguchi , show all

Received 18 Mar 2020, Accepted 05 Sep 2020, Published online: 07 Oct 2020

• Download citation
• https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.182124
• 
  

 

Select Language​▼

Translator disclaimer

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the daily wheelchair self-propulsion distance and functional recovery in subacute stroke survivors.

Methods

Seventy-four patients with stroke were prospectively recruited from four convalescent rehabilitation hospitals. All participants were unable to walk independently and required manual wheelchairs for locomotion on admission. The daily wheelchair self-propulsion distance was measured using a cycle computer that was connected to a touch switch to exclude the assistance-propulsion distance. The outcome measures were represented as the relative gain of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) effectiveness during hospitalization. Moreover, a better functional recovery was defined as a FIM effectiveness > 50%. Participants were categorized into three groups according to tertiles of the average daily wheelchair self-propulsion distance: lowest tertile (T1, ≤0.59 km/day); middle tertile (T2, 0.60–1.23 km/day); and highest tertile (T3, ≥1.24 km/day).

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics showed that the T2 and T3 groups had a significant association with better FIM effectiveness, and their odds ratios (95% confidence interval, p) were 7.26 (1.13–45.85, p = .038), and 10.19 (1.15–91.75, p = .035), respectively.

Conclusions

The daily wheelchair self-propulsion distance was significantly associated with functional recovery in subacute stroke survivors.

• IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

• Non-ambulatory stroke survivors can obtain extra independent physical activity by using wheelchair self-propulsion, when they do not have someone to assist them with walking.

• This multicenter observational study revealed that the self-propulsion distance of a manual-wheelchair was significantly associated with functional recovery in subacute stroke survivors.