Measuring value: Cost-effectiveness analysis for occupational therapy

Value to survivors is recovery.  IF YOU'RE NOT MEASURING THAT, YOU'RE NOT HELPING YOUR SURVIVORS. My god, does no one in stroke have two functioning neurons to rub together?

Measuring value: Cost-effectiveness analysis for occupational therapy

American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) , Volume 76(1) , Pgs. 7601347010.

NARIC Accession Number: J88795.  What's this?
ISSN: 0272-9490.
Author(s): Morrow, Corey; Simpson, Kit.
Publication Year: 2022.
Number of Pages: 5.
Abstract: 

Article illustrates the contribution of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to stroke rehabilitation using a hypothetical new occupational therapy intervention as an example. It also explains how CEA improves consistency with reporting standards for cost-effectiveness studies. Stroke rehabilitation is expensive, and recent changes to Medicare reimbursement demand more efficient interventions. The use of CEA can help occupational therapy practitioners, rehabilitation directors, and payers better understand the value of occupational therapy and decide whether to implement new treatments.
Descriptor Terms: COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS, INTERVENTION, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, REHABILITATION, STROKE.


Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.

Citation: Morrow, Corey, Simpson, Kit. (2022). Measuring value: Cost-effectiveness analysis for occupational therapy.  American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) , 76(1), Pgs. 7601347010. Retrieved 6/23/2022, from REHABDATA database.