Since only 10% of survivors get to full recovery, there is NO therapy department in the world that is effective. That is how stroke survivors rate effectiveness, they don't use the tyranny of low expectations to declare success. Stroke survivors have only 1 question to answer: Am I 100% recovered? Y/N? If yes, you may have an effective stroke department.
IEEE
Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering : a
Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,
03 Nov 2022, PP
DOI:
10.1109/tnsre.2022.3219085 PMID: 36327176
Share this article
Share with emailShare with linkedinShare with facebook
Abstract
Post-stroke
therapy restores lost skills. Traditionally, patients are supported by
skilled therapists who monitor their progress and evaluate the program's
effectiveness. Due to a shortage of qualified therapists,
rehabilitation facilities are both expensive and inadequate.
Furthermore, evaluations may be subjective and prone to errors. These
limitations motivate the researchers to devise automated systems with
minimal human intervention, therapist-like assessment, and broader
outreach. This article reviews seminal works from 2013 onwards,
qualitatively and quantitatively adapting the PRISMA approach to examine
the potential of robot-assisted, virtual reality-based rehabilitation
and automated assessments through data-driven learning. Extensive
experimentation on KIMORE and UI-PRMD datasets reveal high agreement
between automated methods and therapists. Our investigation shows that
deep learning with spatio-temporal skeleton data and dynamic attention
outperforms others, with an RMSE as low as 0.55. Fully automated
rehabilitation is still in development, but, being an active research
topic, it could hasten objective assessment and improve outreach.
Full text links
No comments:
Post a Comment