Tuesday, December 27, 2022

Factors Predicting Return to Work Following Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Follow-Up Stud

This shouldn't be so hard, with 100% recovery protocols there wouldn't be a problem at all. SO SOLVE THE CORRECT PROBLEM, 100% RECOVERY PROTOCOLS!

What this means you are a complete failure, if you have to predict back to work chances.

Factors Predicting Return to Work Following Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100253Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
Open access

Highlights

What is Known

Returning to work after stroke is a key milestone in recovery; however, many patients are unable to achieve this. Research has shown that predictors vary across countries.

What is New

In addition to identifying predictive factors, this study identified how these factors could be utilised for screening for referral to return to work services at the time of inpatient rehabilitation discharge.

Abstract

Objective

To determine the proportion of patients that return to work (RTW) after inpatient stroke rehabilitation and to identify demographic, clinical, and functional predictive factors for its success.

Design

A retrospective follow-up study of stroke patients who were premorbidly working and had completed inpatient rehabilitation in a large metropolitan hospital between January 2016 and December 2017 (N=314). They underwent a telephone interview at 2 years post-discharge.

Settings

Inpatient rehabilitation and follow-up post discharge

Participants

314 stroke patients (73.9% male) with mean age of 58.9 at time of stroke

Results

46% of 314 participants returned to work. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, those who viewed return to work as important (OR 11.90, 95% CI 5.15 to 27.52), absence of language impairment (OR 9.39, 95% CI 3.01 to 29.34), ambulation Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ≥5 (supervision to independence level) on discharge (OR 4.93, 95% CI 2.44 to 9.98), cognitive FIM on discharge of ≥25 (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.19 to 6.47), those with premorbid office work (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.64) and a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score at discharge (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.00), were associated with successful RTW.

Conclusion

Attitudes that viewed return to work as important, absence of language impairments on discharge, discharge ambulation FIM of at least 5, discharge cognitive FIM of at least 25, premorbid office work and a lower discharge CCI score, were positive predictors of successful return to work.

No comments:

Post a Comment