Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,372 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Flow diverters with surface modification (FDSM) are increasingly used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety across different devices and antiplatelet therapies using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
A systematic review was performed to identify original studies of ≥10 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with FDSM from database inception through August 2023. Primary effectiveness outcome was the rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up ≥6 months. Safety outcomes included ischemic stroke, hemorrhage and in-stent thrombosis, and were stratified by FDSM devices and antiplatelet therapies. Certainty of evidence was evaluated following the GRADE approach.
Twenty-seven studies were included, yielding 2161 patients with 2373 aneurysms. 70.5% of the aneurysms were located on the internal carotid artery (ICA). 10.3% were acutely ruptured. The complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 72.3% at follow-up ≥6 months. Sensitivity analysis in the ICA aneurysm cohort yielded comparable occlusion rates between PED-Shield (80.4%) and Phenox-HPC (77.5%, P=0.54), but a lower 66.2% rate for FRED-X (P=0.02). The rate of in-stent thrombosis and stenosis tended to be higher in Phenox-HPC (3.4%) and FRED-X (4.3%) versus PED-Shield (0.8%, P=0.05).
FDSM were safe with satisfactory effectiveness for intracranial aneurysms. More specific investigations are warranted to explore their performance in aneurysms beyond the ICA and optimal antiplatelet therapy.
No comments:
Post a Comment