Monday, January 15, 2024

Flow diverters with surface modification in patients with intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 Ask your doctor if this intervention guarantees no strokes as a result.

Flow diverters with surface modification in patients with intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , , ,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.132Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Flow diverters with surface modification (FDSM) are increasingly used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety across different devices and antiplatelet therapies using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic review was performed to identify original studies of ≥10 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with FDSM from database inception through August 2023. Primary effectiveness outcome was the rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up ≥6 months. Safety outcomes included ischemic stroke, hemorrhage and in-stent thrombosis, and were stratified by FDSM devices and antiplatelet therapies. Certainty of evidence was evaluated following the GRADE approach.

Results

Twenty-seven studies were included, yielding 2161 patients with 2373 aneurysms. 70.5% of the aneurysms were located on the internal carotid artery (ICA). 10.3% were acutely ruptured. The complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 72.3% at follow-up ≥6 months. Sensitivity analysis in the ICA aneurysm cohort yielded comparable occlusion rates between PED-Shield (80.4%) and Phenox-HPC (77.5%, P=0.54), but a lower 66.2% rate for FRED-X (P=0.02). The rate of in-stent thrombosis and stenosis tended to be higher in Phenox-HPC (3.4%) and FRED-X (4.3%) versus PED-Shield (0.8%, P=0.05).

Conclusions

FDSM were safe with satisfactory effectiveness for intracranial aneurysms. More specific investigations are warranted to explore their performance in aneurysms beyond the ICA and optimal antiplatelet therapy.

No comments:

Post a Comment