Assessments
are completely worthless unless they point directly to the 100%
recovery protocols. I see nothing here that suggests you go from the
assessment to the chosen 100% recovery protocol. When the hell will the
stroke medical world do ANYTHING TO GET STROKE SOLVED? I'd have you all
fired! A lot of dead wood needs to removed in stroke and until that
occurs stroke will never be solved!
Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,395 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
The Motor Activity Log-28 Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke
G. Uswatte, PhD; E. Taub, PhD; D. Morris, PhD, PT; K. Light, PhD, PT; and P.A. Thompson, PhD
Background:
Data from monkeys with deafferented forelimbs and humans after stroke indicate that tests of
the motor capacity of impaired extremities can overestimate their spontaneous use. Before the Motor Activity Log (MAL)
was developed, no instruments assessed spontaneous use of a hemiparetic arm outside the treatment setting.
Objective:
To
study the MAL’s reliability and validity for assessing real-world quality of movement (QOM scale) and amount of use
(AOU scale) of the hemiparetic arm in stroke survivors. Methods: Participants in a multisite clinical trial completed a
30-item MAL before and after treatment (n = 106) or an equivalent no-treatment period (n = 116). Participants also
completed the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and wore accelerometers that monitored arm movement for three consecutive
days outside the laboratory. All were 3 to 12 months post-stroke and had mild to moderate paresis of an upper extremity.
Results:
After an item analysis, two MAL tasks were eliminated. Revised participant MAL QOM scores were reliable (r =
0.82). Validity was also supported. During the first observation period, the correlation between QOM and SIS Hand
Function scale scores was 0.72. The corresponding correlation for QOM and accelerometry values was 0.52. Participant
QOM and AOU scores were highly correlated (r = 0.92).
Conclusions:
The participant Motor Activity Log is reliable and
valid in individuals with subacute stroke. It might be employed to assess the real-world effects of upper extremity
neurorehabilitation and detect deficits in spontaneous use of the hemiparetic arm in daily life.
NEUROLOGY 2006;67:1189–1194
No comments:
Post a Comment