Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Acute Intermittent Hypoxia With High-Intensity Gait Training in Chronic Stroke: A Phase II Randomized Crossover Trial

 Definition: Acute intermittent hypoxia refers to brief (acute), repetitive (intermittent) episodes of breathing oxygen-deprived air (hypoxia) alternating with breathing ambient room air

I can't imagine that this will do a damn bit of good for me, my problem is spasticity which no one in the world knows how to cure and no one is working on curing spasticity!

It would be great if they explained why this gave better gait. If you don't know why, how can you make it better?

Acute Intermittent Hypoxia With High-Intensity Gait Training in Chronic Stroke: A Phase II Randomized Crossover Trial

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047261Stroke. 2024;0

BACKGROUND:

Studies in individuals with chronic stroke indicate high-intensity training (HIT) focused on walking improves locomotor function, which may be due to repeated activation of locomotor circuits and serotonin-dependent modulation of motor output. Separate studies in animals and individuals with spinal cord injury suggest acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) can augment the effects of locomotor interventions through similar serotonin-dependent mechanisms, although no studies have coupled AIH with HIT in individuals poststroke. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AIH+HIT versus HIT alone in individuals with chronic stroke.

METHODS:

This phase II double-blind randomized, crossover trial recruited individuals between 18 and 85 years old, >6 months poststroke, and self-selected speeds <1.0 m/s. Participants received up to 15 sessions of AIH for 30 minutes using 15 cycles of hypoxia (60–90 seconds; 8%–9% O2) and normoxia (30–60 seconds; 21% O2), followed by 1 hour of HIT targeting >75% heart rate reserve. The control condition received normoxia for 30 minutes before HIT. Following the first training phase, participants performed the second phase >1 month later. The primary outcomes were self-selected speed and fastest speed, a 6-minute walk test, and peak treadmill speed. A 3-way mixed-model ANOVA assessed the effects of time, training, and order of interventions.

RESULTS:

Of 55 individuals screened, 35 were randomized to AIH+HIT or normoxia+HIT first, and 28 individuals completed both interventions, revealing greater gains in self-selected speeds (0.14 [0.08–0.18] versus 0.05 [0.01–0.10] m/s), fastest speed (0.16 [0.10–0.21] versus 0.06 [0.02–0.10] m/s), and peak treadmill speed (0.21 [0.14–0.29] versus 0.11 [0.06–0.16] m/s) following AIH+HIT versus normoxia+HIT (P<0.01) with no order effects. Greater gains in spatiotemporal symmetry were observed with AIH+HIT, with worse outcomes for those prescribed serotonin-mediated antidepressant medications.

CONCLUSIONS:

AIH+HIT resulted in greater gains in locomotor function than normoxia+HIT. Subsequent phase III trials should further evaluate the efficacy of this intervention.

REGISTRATION:

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT04472442.

No comments:

Post a Comment