Thursday, October 10, 2024

Efficacy and safety of very early rehabilitation for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 My god, the ABSOLUTE FUCKING STUPIDITY DISPLAYED HERE! Very early rehabilitation does nothing towards the mortality risk! You are totally missing not stopping the 5 causes of the neuronal cascade of death in the first week thus not saving millions to billions of neurons.  Those dead neurons are likely the reason for the increased mortality.  Do you not understand cause and effect?

Efficacy and safety of very early rehabilitation for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Ying Lou Ying Lou Zhongshuo Liu Zhongshuo Liu Yingxiao Ji Yingxiao Ji Jinming Cheng Jinming Cheng Congying Zhao Congying Zhao Litao Li Litao Li *
  • Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: 

    Early rehabilitation after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) contributes to functional recovery. However, the optimal time for starting rehabilitation remains a topic of ongoing investigation. This article aims to shed light on the safety and efficacy of very early rehabilitation (VER) initiated within 48 hours of stroke onset. 

    Methods: 

    A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted from inception to January 20, 2024. Relevant literature on VER in patients with AIS was reviewed and the data related to favorable and adverse clinical outcomes were collected for meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was conducted at different time points, namely at discharge and at three and 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed with the help of the Meta Package in STATA Version 15.0. 

    Results: 

    A total of 14 randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies and 3,039 participants were included in the analysis. VER demonstrated a significant association with mortality [risk ratio (RR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.00, 1.61)], ability of daily living [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 6.90, 95% CI (0.22, 13.57)], and limb motor function [WMD = 5.02, 95% CI (1.63, 8.40)]. However, no significant difference was observed between the VER group and the control group in adverse events [RR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.79, 1.01)], severity of stroke [WMD = 0.52, 95% CI (-0.04, 1.08)], degree of disability [RR = 1.06, 95% CI (0.93, 1.20)], or recovery of walking [RR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.94, 1.03)] after stroke. Subgroup analysis revealed that VER reduced the risk of adverse events in the late stage (at three and 12 months) [RR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.74, 0.99)] and degree of disability at 12 months [RR = 1.28, 95% CI (1.03, 1.60)], and improved daily living ability at three months [WMD=4.26, 95% CI (0.17,8.35)], while increasing severity of stroke during hospitalization [WMD=0.81, 95% CI (0.01, 1.61)]. Conclusion: VER improves activities of daily living (ADLs) and lowers the incidence of long-term complications in stroke survivors. However, premature or overly intense rehabilitation may increase mortality in patients with AIS during the acute phase. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024508180.

    Keywords: Rehabilitation, Early Ambulation, ischemic stroke, prognosis, Meta-analysis

    Received: 03 May 2024; Accepted: 09 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Lou, Liu, Ji, Cheng, Zhao and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Litao Li, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China 

    No comments:

    Post a Comment