We don't SPECIFICALLY know why a neuron gives up its' current job and takes on a neighbors. Thus, nothing on neuroplasticity is scientifically repeatable on demand. So, DEMAND your doctor give you EXACT PROTOCOLS to use. Don't allow your doctor to give you generalities or guidelines. This person understands that problem because of the word theoretical instead of detailing exactly how to deliver neuroplasticity exactly.
ADAPTIVE NEUROPLASTICITY ASSOCIATED WITH ISCHEMIC
BRAIN DAMAGE AND ITS ROLE IN STROKE RECOVERY: THEORETICAL PREREQUISITES FOR EFFECTIVE NEUROREHABILITATION
Khairieva Mukhsina Farkhadovna
Bukhoro davlat Tibbet institutes
THESIS
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-0015
xayriyeva.muxsina@bsmi.uz
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15227136
Ischemic brain damage, like other pathogenic factors, initiates the
reorganization of cortical centers and pathways outside the "nuclear zone" of
acute or chronic ischemia, which limits the spontaneous restoration of functions
in victims. Accordingly, knowledge of the basic patterns of post-ischemic
neuroplastic remodeling(This doesn't exist yet, so your incompetent doctor needs to get that research going! The problem has been known for decades which is why I consider your doctor incompetent for not even attempting to get it solved. It's as if survivor recovery is not in the job description! And that leads directly to board of directors incompetence for not setting correct goals!) is crucial for developing more effective rehabilitation
strategies for stroke patients. The article discusses modern concepts of
neuroplasticity: the main patterns of post-stroke reorganization of the central
nervous system, studied in rodents, as well as clinical markers of compensatory
and regenerative processes in conditions of chronic cerebral ischemia in
cerebrovascular diseases, which allows us to identify the mechanisms
underlying the remodeling of neural networks in the penumbra and
contralateral hemisphere against the background of ischemic damage. At the
same time, the analysis of electrophysiological experimental data demonstrated
the restructuring of functional connections in both hemispheres far beyond the
focus of cerebral infarction, and clinical and biochemical studies on the model of
chronic cerebral ischemia in patients helped to identify key trophic factors
determining compensatory and regenerative processes. The results obtained
make it possible to justify the use of noninvasive brain stimulation methods and
some pharmacological agents to accelerate the recovery of impaired functions in
patients with this profile, and therefore to form rehabilitation protocols using
robotic devices to promote the development of adaptive neuroplasticity and full-
fledged functional recovery.
In this regard, it seems relevant to analyze the results of recent
experimental and clinical studies that have studied the processes of
neuroplasticity in ischemic brain lesions in order to develop and implement new
rehabilitation strategies.
The term "brain plasticity" or "neuroplasticity" defines all (morphological
and functional) changes in neural networks and glial complexes that occur in the
central nervous system throughout a person's life [9]. These changes are not
only closely related to the mechanisms of learning, development, aging, and
adaptation to the environment, but also underlie adaptive neuroplasticity –
compensatory and regenerative reactions that occur during the formation of
pathomorphological and/or functional disorders caused by diseases or injuries
of the nervous system [10]. In particular, acute ischemia and chronic ischemia
cause multilevel (in the cerebral cortex, the penumbra zone of the affected
hemisphere and the contralateral hemisphere, subcortical and cerebrospinal
regions) neuroplastic reactions of neural networks with temporal and spatial
organization (Figure) [11, 12], and these changes are sensitive to subsequent
damage regardless of their nature [13, 14].
The degree and range of neuroplastic changes depend on the size and rate
of formation of ischemic brain damage (acute or chronic). In microinfarcts
developing in the cerebral cortex against the background of transient ischemic
attacks or chronic cerebral ischemia caused, for example, by small vessel
disease, periinfarction zones can compensate for lost functions in the shortest
possible time, which explains the existence of "mute" strokes [1, 2]. This is
especially true of the ventral premotor region, which, being in close relationship
with the primary motor cortex, produces and releases vascular endothelial
growth factor, which has angiogenic and neuroprotective properties in the early
period after a heart attack [12]. In rodents, after a stroke, there is a steady
reorganization of the motor map of the rostral zone of representation of the
forelimbs (premotor cortex) [2, 3, 4]. Accordingly, the development of secondary
post-ischemic metabolic disorders in it exacerbates the primary motor deficit
[5].
The mechanisms underlying cortical reorganization and restoration of
impaired functions remain not fully understood [1]. This is especially true of the
gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system and neuroglia, which may play an
important role in the control of neuroplastic reactions. So far, it has been
established that the neuroglial matrix, which consists of condensed chondroitin
sulfate proteoglycans surrounding mainly the bodies of GABAergic neurons,
correlates according to the feedback principle with adaptive neuroplasticity and
repair of the brain due to interneurons containing parvalbumin [6]. The
significance of perineuronal networks has been thoroughly investigated during
the maturation of the visual system. They have been found to have a stabilizing
effect on mature neural networks and a negative effect on neuroplasticity [7, 8].
Thus, inhibition of perineuronal networks by injections of the bacterial enzyme
chondroitinase ABC after damage to the central nervous system accelerated the
restoration of sensorimotor functions [3-4], and a spontaneous decrease in the
number of perineuronal networks in the cortex in the penumbra area indicated
an increase in adaptive neuroplasticity [23]. In turn, increased GABAergic
activity after stroke did not improve recovery rates [2], but rather worsened
motor deficits [4]. Moreover, it has been clinically confirmed that an artificial
decrease in GABAergic activity had a positive effect on functional recovery [4].
A special role in the development of neurological deficits in acute and
chronic ischemia and further functional recovery is played by the hemisphere
contralateral to the actual lesion, since animal studies and clinical practice have
well shown that neuronal connections after acute ischemia change not only in
the damaged hemisphere of the brain, but also on the opposite side.
Due to the improvement of scientific methods, it has become possible to
study changes in remote brain regions with local ischemic damage based on the
concept of connectionism within the framework of microscopic (synapses),
mesoscopic (homotopic brain regions) and macroscopic (thalamo-cortical
connections) neuroplastic reactions.
References at link.
No comments:
Post a Comment