Friday, March 11, 2016

Movement distributions of stroke survivors exhibit distinct patterns that evolve with training

Well fuck, then write it up as a stroke protocol and distribute it around the world. NO ONE else is going to do this job.  Or is this just a description with absolutely no usefulness to survivors? If so, this is what our stroke leaders should not be financing.
http://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-016-0132-y
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation201613:23
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-016-0132-y
Received: 18 December 2014
Accepted: 29 February 2016
Published: 9 March 2016

Abstract

Background

While clinical assessments provide tools for characterizing abilities in motor-impaired individuals, concerns remain over their repeatability and reliability. Typical robot-assisted training studies focus on repetition of prescribed actions, yet such movement data provides an incomplete account of abnormal patterns of coordination. Recent studies have shown positive effects from self-directed movement, yet such a training paradigm leads to challenges in how to quantify and interpret performance.

Methods

With data from chronic stroke survivors (n = 10, practicing for 3 days), we tabulated histograms of the displacement, velocity, and acceleration for planar motion, and examined whether modeling of distributions could reveal changes in available movement patterns. We contrasted these results with scalar measures of the range of motion. We performed linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classification with selected histogram features to compare predictions versus actual subject identifiers. As a basis of comparison, we also present an age-matched control group of healthy individuals (n = 10, practicing for 1 day).

Results

Analysis of range of motion did not show improvement from self-directed movement training for the stroke survivors in this study. However, examination of distributions indicated that increased multivariate normal components were needed to accurately model the patterns of movement after training. Stroke survivors generally exhibited more complex distributions of motor exploration compared to the age-matched control group. Classification using linear discriminant analysis revealed that movement patterns were identifiable by individual. Individuals in the control group were more difficult to identify using classification methods, consistent with the idea that motor deficits contribute significantly to unique movement signatures.

Conclusions

Distribution analysis revealed individual patterns of abnormal coordination in stroke survivors and changes in these patterns with training. These findings were not apparent from scalar metrics that simply summarized properties of motor exploration. Our results suggest new methods for characterizing motor capabilities, and could provide the basis for powerful tools for designing customized therapy.

No comments:

Post a Comment