Critically Appraised Paper for “Bobath concept versus constraint-induced movement therapy to improve arm functional recovery in stroke patients:

Why the hell are we still writing about NDT/Bobath? It has been proven multiple times to not be effective. Because we have no public database of stroke research and protocols we get stuff like this that wastes time and resources.  Meaning that our stroke researchers don't keep up-to-date in their own field. A great stroke association president would be on top of this problem because a strategy would be being followed. But we have NO STRATEGY AND NO LEADERSHIP.

Comparison Of Two Physiotherapy Approaches InAcute Stroke Rehabilitation: Motor Relearning Program Versus Bobath Approach.

 

Motor Relearning Program vs. Bobath:
http://cre.sagepub.com/content/14/4/361.short

 

And here is Peter Levines take on NDT:
http://recoverfromstroke.blogspot.com/2013/01/neuro-developmental-treatment.html

 

The latest crap here:

http://scholar.dominican.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=ot-caps
Emily Garnica Dominican University of California, emilycgarnica@gmail.com Savannah Hancock Dominican University of California, savannahhancock@gmail.com Tiffany Huang Dominican University of California, tdhuang23@gmail.com Jessica Phung Dominican University of California, phung.jessica1@gmail.com Kitsum LiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Dominican University of California, kitsum.Li@dominican.edu