Stratication of stroke rehabilitation: Five-year profiles of functional outcomes

So rather than come up with recovery protocols, let's just cherry pick the best survivors for rehabilitation.  Lots of statistics which are incomprehensible, so survivors can't discuss with their doctors to get to 100% recovery. 
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S1013702518500129
Bryan Ping Ho Chung Physiotherapy Department, Tai Po Hospital Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong taipobryan@yahoo.com Received 6 June 2017; Accepted 13 September 2017; Published 14 August 2018
Background: Stroke rehabilitation in inpatient setting requires high intensity of manpower and resources. Early stratification of patients with stroke could facilitate early discharge plan and reduce avoidable length of stay (LOS) in hospital. Stratification of patients with stroke in clinical setting is usually based on functional scores which are quite time-consuming and require a special training to complete the full score.
Objective: The objective of the study was to explore whether Modified Functional Ambulation Category (MFAC) can serve as a stratification tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation. Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic, functional outcomes of patients with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation center. A total of 2,722 patients completed a stroke rehabilitation program from 2011 to 2015 were recruited. The patients were divided into seven groups according to their admission MFAC. The between-group difference in LOS, functional outcomes at admission and discharge including Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI) and Modi ̄ed Barthel Index (MBI) as well as MRMI gain, MRMI efficiency, MBI gain, and MBI efciency were analyzed.
Results: Subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 and 3 had a highly signifīcant ( p < 0 : 001) MRMI gain (6.2 and 6.6, respectively) and subjects with admission categories of MFAC 3 to 5 had highly significant ( P < 0 : 001) MRMI efficiency (0.34, 0.40, and 0.39, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 to 5 had a highly signi ̄cant ( p < 0 : 001) MBI gain (9.7, 10.2, 9.3, and 7.0, respectively) and the subjects with admission categories of MFAC 4 to 5 had a highly significant ( p <0 : 001) MBI efficiency (0.70 and 0.72, respectively). The subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and 2 had a highly significant ( p < 0 : 001) LOS (27.7 and 26.6, respectively). MFAC profile was also established to represent the distribution of discharge MFAC of subjects according to their admission MFAC. The chance of subjects with admission categories of MFAC 1 and MFAC 2 progress to any kind of walker (MFAC > 2) is 12.7% and 58.2%, respectively. The chance of subjects with admission MFAC 3, MFAC 4 and MFAC 5 progress to independent walker (MFAC > 5) is 6.7%, 14.8%, and 50.3%, respectively. Both admission MFAC and Copyright@2018, Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association. Published by World Scienti ̄c Publishing Co Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal Vol. 38, No. 2 (2018) 1 – 7 DOI: 10.1142/S1013702518500129 1Research Paper Hong Kong Physiother. J. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by 68.51.198.31 on 08/21/18. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles. admission MBI had strong correlations with discharge MFAC ( r ¼ 0 : 84, P < 0 : 0001 and r ¼ 0 : 78, P < 0 : 0001, respectively), discharge MRMI ( r ¼ 0 : 82, P < 0 : 0001 and r ¼ 0 : 78, P < 0 : 0001, respectively) and discharge MBI ( r ¼ 0 : 78, P < 0 : r ¼ 0 : 94, P < 0 : 0001, respectively).
Conclusion: This study showed that patients on admission with moderate disability in term of MFAC had the greatest mobility gain and basic activities of daily living (ADL) gain from inpatient stroke rehabilitation.  Admission MFAC could be a stratication tool of patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation.