Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Return to work after ischemic stroke in young adults

You can completely blame your doctors and stroke hospital for this. Decades ago they should have gotten research going into stopping the neuronal cascade of death in the first week. That would have resulted in much less dead and dying neurons, which would in turn mean that the therapy you get would have a much better chance of working.  But don't you know that this meme from a couple years ago means you were well treated with your therapy.  

Treat obviously does not mean cured or anything close to 100% recovery. 100% recovery is the only goal in stroke and someday I'll be able to present that to 'stroke leaders'.

Return to work after ischemic stroke in young adults

Karoliina Aarnio, Jorge Rodríguez-Pardo, Bob Siegerink, Juliane Hardt, Jenna Broman, Lauri Tulkki, Elena Haapaniemi, Markku Kaste, Turgut Tatlisumak, Jukka Putaala

Abstract

Objective We aimed to investigate the proportion of young patients not returning to work (NRTW) at 1 year after ischemic stroke (IS) and during follow-up, and clinical factors associated with NRTW.
Methods Patients from the Helsinki Young Stroke Registry with an IS occurring in the years 1994–2007, who were at paid employment within 1 year before IS, and with NIH Stroke Scale score ≤15 points at hospital discharge, were included. Data on periods of payment came from the Finnish Centre for Pensions, and death data from Statistics Finland. Multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed factors associated with NRTW 1 year after IS, and lasagna plots visualized the proportion of patients returning to work over time.
Results We included a total of 769 patients, of whom 289 (37.6%) were not working at 1 year, 323 (42.0%) at 2 years, and 361 (46.9%) at 5 years from IS. When adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and NIH Stroke Scale score at admission, factors associated with NRTW at 1 year after IS were large anterior strokes, strokes caused by large artery atherosclerosis, high-risk sources of cardioembolism, and rare causes other than dissection compared with undetermined cause, moderate to severe aphasia vs no aphasia, mild and moderate to severe limb paresis vs no paresis, and moderate to severe visual field deficit vs no deficit.
Conclusions NRTW is a frequent adverse outcome after IS in young adults with mild to moderate IS. Clinical variables available during acute hospitalization may allow prediction of NRTW.

Footnotes

  • * These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • Received March 28, 2018.
  • Accepted in final form August 2, 2018.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

No comments:

Post a Comment