Thursday, December 6, 2018

Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multi-site pilot project

The real problem here is using recommendations and guidelines. If you were using protocols you would have a defined objective starting diagnosis, exact instructions on what to do and an efficacy rating. 

I blame the mentors and senior researchers for not specifying that the outcomes of research is ALWAYS clinical rehab protocols. They should be fired for not doing this follow thru.

You don't know how to translate research? Here's how.  Must I do everything?

Stroke Research Translation Template

 

Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multi-site pilot project


Pages 1633-1638 | Received 01 Jul 2011, Accepted 01 Jan 2012, Published online: 28 May 2012


Purpose: To describe the barriers to implementation of evidence-based recommendations (EBRs) for stroke rehabilitation experienced by nurses, occupational therapists, physical therapists, physicians and hospital managers.  
Methods: The Stroke Canada Optimization of Rehabilitation by Evidence project developed EBRs for arm and leg rehabilitation after stroke. Five Canadian stroke inpatient rehabilitation centers participated in a pilot implementation study. At each site, a clinician was identified as the “local facilitator” to promote the 6-month implementation. A research coordinator observed the process. Focus groups done at completion were analyzed thematically for barriers by two raters.  
Results: A total of 79 rehabilitation professionals (23 occupational therapists, 17 physical therapists, 23 nurses and 16 directors/managers) participated in 21 focus groups of three to six participants each. The most commonly noted barrier to implementation was lack of time followed by staffing issues, training/education, therapy selection and prioritization, equipment availability and team functioning/communication. There was variation in perceptions of barriers across stakeholders. Nurses noted more training and staffing issues and managers perceived fewer barriers than frontline clinicians.  
Conclusions: Rehabilitation guideline developers should prioritize evidence for implementation and employ user-friendly language. Guideline implementation strategies must be extremely time efficient. Organizational approaches may be required to overcome the barriers.
Implications for Rehabiliation
  • Despite increasingly strong evidence for stroke rehabilitation, there are delays in implementation into clinical practice.
  • This study showed that lack of time, staffing issues, staff education, therapy selection or prioritization, lack of equipment and team functioning were the main barriers to implementation.
  • Managers and stakeholders should consider these barriers and prioritize evidence when implementing.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment