Friday, January 31, 2025

Advancing stroke rehabilitation: the role of wearable technology according to research experts

 In simple words; the complete stroke medical world is totally fucking incompetent for not already having protocols on wearables! 

With all this information out there who thinks this shows any sign of competence in your stroke medical 'professionals'? No one from the stroke medical world has ever contacted me to tell me I'm full of shit. I'm happily waiting for that day, it will be fun.
  •  wearable (39 posts to April 2012)
  • wearable EMG (1 post to January 2024)
  • wearable arms (1 post to May 2013)
  • wearable computing (3 posts to August 2013)
  • wearable devices (38 posts to October 2015)
  • wearable electronic device (1 post to July 2020)
  • wearable exoskeletons (1 post to April 2022)
  • Wearable inertial measurement units (2 posts to June 2019)
  • wearable inertial sensor (2 posts to June 2023)
  • wearable motion-tracking (1 post to July 2023)
  • wearable robotics (1 post to July 2022)
  • wearable sensors (26 posts to January 2018)
  • Advancing stroke rehabilitation: the role of wearable technology according to research experts

     

    Abstract

    Background

    Advancements in wearable technology have created new opportunities to monitor stroke survivors’ behaviors in daily activities. Research insights are needed to guide its adoption in clinical practice, address current gaps, and shape the future of stroke rehabilitation. This project aims to: (1) Understand stroke rehabilitation researchers’ perspectives on the opportunities, challenges, and clinical relevance of wearable technology for stroke rehabilitation, and (2) Identify necessary next steps to integrate wearable technology in research and clinical practice.

    Methods

    Using a phenomenological qualitative design, two 90-minute focus groups were conducted with 12 rehabilitation researchers. The focus groups consisted of semi-structured, open-ended questions on functional movement behavior, motor performance and benefits and pitfalls of wearable technology. The transcribed focus groups were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

    Results

    Three main themes were derived from the analysis: (1) Assessing activity performance is critical to inform interventions, (2) The demonstrated benefit is not commensurate with the added hassle, (3) Collaboration is needed between the industry, academia and end-users. Necessary future steps were recognized including the identification of intuitive and actionable metrics, and the integration of sensor-derived data with electronic health records and into clinical workflow to support self-management strategies.

    Conclusion

    Wearable technology shows great potential to complement and support stroke rehabilitation. Many key barriers to clinical adoption remain(Well solve them! LEADERS WOULD SOLVE THEM! You're not leaders, are you?) which underscore the necessity to foster collaborations between industry, academia, and the participants we serve.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

    • Wearable technology provides critical information about activity performance to understand stroke survivors’ behavior and inform interventions.

    • Concerted efforts of interdisciplinary research teams in partnerships with users and the industry are essential to accelerate clinical and research adoption.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment