Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

International group revises diagnostic guidance for Alzheimer’s

 

With your elevated chances of dementia post stroke, your competent? doctor and hospital are responsible for preventing that! Have they taken on that responsibility to check if this would help diagnose dementia post stroke? Or are they DOING NOTHING?

With your chances of getting dementia post stroke, you need prevention solutions. YOUR DOCTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING THIS!

1. A documented 33% dementia chance post-stroke from an Australian study?   May 2012.

2. Then this study came out and seems to have a range from 17-66%. December 2013.`    

3. A 20% chance in this research.   July 2013.

4. Dementia Risk Doubled in Patients Following Stroke September 2018 

The latest here:

International group revises diagnostic guidance for Alzheimer’s

Tomography
A consortium of 46 international Alzheimer’s disease experts issued revised guidelines for disease diagnosis. Image: Adobe Stock

“These recommendations are the collaborative effort of 46 international experts who emphasize that diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease should primarily rely on clinical evaluation supported by biomarkers,” Bruno Dubois, MD, MSc, of the Institute of Memory and Alzheimer’s disease in the department of neurology at Salpetriere Hospital in Paris, said in a release related to the guidelines, which were published in JAMA Neurology.

Key takeaways:

  • The guidance outlines core biomarkers for Alzheimer’s, including cerebrospinal fluid, evidence of tau protein and amyloid-beta.
  • It also includes three new terms for stages of disease progression.

The International Working Group has updated diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease to include individuals with normal cognition who test positive for core biomarkers indicative of disease pathology.


The recommendations, which revise the organization’s 2021 guidelines, were presented at the 2024 Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Disease (CTAD) conference in Madrid. They permit that biological evidence may not be the sole manner in which AD can be defined, with core biomarkers being cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), amyloid-beta and tau, as well as plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau-217) found via positron emission tomography.

The revisions were also intended to separate patients into two groups: individuals who display typical AD-related symptoms along with evidence of disease-specific biomarkers who are diagnosed with AD vs. those who have evidence of disease-specific biomarkers but no symptoms which predict eventual disease progression, Dubois added.

The guidelines additionally encourage clinicians to embrace three specific terms relating to disease pathology and progression.

Those deemed asymptomatic but at risk for AD:(We stroke survivors are at risk)

  • are cognitively normal but are at elevated risk for becoming cognitively impaired due to unknown risk from a biomarker profile;
  • are at increased risk for progression to cognitive impairment compared to those without biomarker presence; and
  • should not be defined as having the condition.

Individuals found to have presymptomatic AD:

  • are cognitively normal individuals who show a pattern of biomarkers consistent with a very high risk for progression to cognitive impairment;
  • possess dominant genetic variations associated with a 100% risk for development to clinical AD such as APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2; and
  • demonstrate biomarker changes, coupled with genetic risk factors, associated with elevated risk for clinical AD development such as those confirmed by PET.

Those with AD:

  • are cognitively impaired individuals with specific clinical phenotypes including aphasia, cortical atrophy along with behavioral or executive dysfunction;
  • test positive for AD-related pathology through analysis of plasma biomarkers, CSF or PET; and
  • show signs of the above in the prodromal and dementia stages of disease.

“Further developing brain health services for the prevention of dementia could lead to better evaluation of risk, communication of risk and risk reduction strategies targeting modifiable risk factors,” Giovanni B. Frisoni, MD, professor in the department of psychiatry at Geneva University Hospital in Switzerland, said in the release.

Reference:

International Working Group publishes revised diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1063432. Published Nov. 1, 2024. Accessed Nov. 1, 2024.

No comments:

Post a Comment