First of all, stop using the term, neuroprotection! Neuronal cascade of death is the correct term! It gives absolutely NO SENSE OF URGENCY! If you tell your patients, you know nothing about stopping the 5 causes of the neuronal cascade of death in the first week thus letting die hundreds of millions to billions of neurons. They might just get angry with your incompetence!
Send me hate mail on this: oc1dean@gmail.com. I'll print your complete statement with your name and my response in my blog. Or are you afraid to engage with my stroke-addled mind? I would like to know why you aren't solving stroke to 100% recovery, because this doesn't solve stroke recovery at all!
You'll have to ask your competent? doctor why the hell edaravone is approved in Japan since 2001 but not the US.
Has your stroke hospital done anything with any of these in the last decade? OR ARE THEY COMPLETELY FUCKING INCOMPENT AT EVERYTHING IN STROKE?
You can easily see how much research is out there to be implemented and your hospital is totally incompetent if not done.
- Cerebrolysin
(12 posts to June 2014)
- citicoline
(15 posts to October 2011)
- minocycline
(17 posts to May 2012)
edaravone (12 posts to November 2011)
Role of vinpocetine in ischemic stroke and poststroke outcomes: A critical review 2020
The latest here:
Comparative Efficacy of Neuroprotective Agents for Improving Neurological Function and Prognosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Network Meta-Analysis
- 1 Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China
- 2 School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
cause of combined disability and mortality globally. While reperfusion therapies play a critical role in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), their applicability is limited, leaving many patients with significant neurological deficits and poor prognoses.Neuroprotective agents have garnered attention for their potential as adjunct therapies; however, their relative efficacy remains unclear. This study utilized a network metaanalysis (NMA) to systematically compare the efficacy of neuroprotective agents in improving neurological function and prognosis in stroke patients. Methods: This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent reviewers conducted the selection process, data extraction, and quality assessment. Outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale(90d-mRS)、change of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score from baseline to 90-day/14-day/7-day (90day/14d/7d-NIHSS) and 90-day/14-day Barthel Index (90d/14d-BI).Data analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0. Results: A total of 42 RCTs involving 12,210 participants were included in this analysis. The interventions assessed included Cerebrolysin, Citicoline, Edaravone, Edaravone Dextranol, HUK, Minocycline, NA-1, NBP, Vinpocetine, and Control. The NMA results demonstrated that NBP ranked highest for the 90d-mRS, 90d-NIHSS, 14d-NIHSS, and 14d-BI outcomes. Edaravone was found to be the most effective intervention for the 7d-NIHSS and 90d-BI outcomes.The findings of this study indicate that different neuroprotective agents exhibit distinct advantages at specific stages of recovery. NBP showed outstanding performance in improving 90d-mRS and 90d-NIHSS, underscoring its potential in long-term rehabilitation. Edaravone demonstrated significant superiority in 7d-NIHSS scores, highlighting its role in early neuroprotection. These results provide valuable insights for individualized clinical treatment. To further validate the efficacy and safety of neuroprotective agents, future studies should involve larger sample sizes and conduct multicenter, large-scale randomized controlled trials.
Keywords: Neuroprotective Agents, Network meta-analysis, n-Butylphthalide, Edaravone, Neurological function, stroke rehabilitation
Received: 19 Nov 2024; Accepted: 13 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Wang, Li, Jiang and JI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
No comments:
Post a Comment