This is totally useless for persons like myself that have spasticity that prevents reaching and opening the hand.
I would never do CIMT/forced use; I couldn't eat, dress or go to the bathroom. Why doesn't your doctor and therapist use this?
And use of the good side recovers the bad side, or don't you know about that research?
Exercising the good side to recover the 'bad' side. December 2012)The latest here:
Constraint-induced movement therapy reduced shoulder pain and improved function in subacute and chronic stroke: a cohort study
Annika Sefastsson1,2
Therése Brändström1
Håkan Littbrand3Per Wester4,5
Ann Sörlin1Britt-Marie Stålnacke1Per Liv4
Xiaolei Hu1*- 1Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 2Liljeholmskliniken, Stockholm, Sweden
- 3Department of Community and Rehabilitation Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 4Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 5Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP), shoulder range of motion (ROM) and upper extremity motor function in stroke patients.
Methods: This longitudinal intervention cohort study was performed in an outpatient clinic without a control group. Participants underwent individually tailored CIMT with a patient therapist ratio of 4:1 for 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 2 consecutive weeks, including daily shoulder strength and joint motion training. A total of 221 (101 with and 120 without pre-CIMT HSP) middle-aged (median 54 years) persons at sub-acute or chronic phases after stroke were included in the study. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) subscale for pain was used for defining and scoring HSP at passive motion (sum of four directions of movement, maximum 8 points indicating no pain). Passive and active shoulder ROM (sum of flexion and abduction) were assessed. Upper extremity motor function was assessed with B. Lindmark Motor Assessment. Assessments were done pre- and post-CIMT and at 3-month follow-up. Comparisons were stratified by subgroups with- and without HSP.
Results: In the subgroup with pre-CIMT HSP, median HSP score at passive movement was reduced (FMA shoulder pain score increased) from pre- to post-CIMT from 5 points to 7 points post-CIMT, (p < 0.001, Effect size (ES) 0.68). Median active ROM increased from 230° to 308° (p < 0.001, ES 0.72) and median passive ROM increased from 350° to 360° (p < 0.001, ES 0.44). Median motor function improved from 42 to 49 points (p < 0.001, ES 0.92). In the subgroup without pre-CIMT HSP no statistically significant increase of HSP was seen and no clinically significant changes observed for active or passive ROM after CIMT. Median motor function improved from 52 to 56 points (p < 0.001, ES 0.71). All improvements persisted at 3-month follow-up.
Conclusion: CIMT in an outpatient clinical setting may be a feasible treatment to decrease HSP and to improve shoulder ROM and upper extremity motor function among middle-aged persons in the subacute and chronic phases after stroke. Results need to be confirmed in an RCT setting.
Annika Sefastsson1,2Therése Brändström1Håkan Littbrand3Per Wester4,5Ann Sörlin1Britt-Marie Stålnacke1Per Liv4Xiaolei Hu1*- 1Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 2Liljeholmskliniken, Stockholm, Sweden
- 3Department of Community and Rehabilitation Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 4Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 5Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP), shoulder range of motion (ROM) and upper extremity motor function in stroke patients.
Methods: This longitudinal intervention cohort study was performed in an outpatient clinic without a control group. Participants underwent individually tailored CIMT with a patient therapist ratio of 4:1 for 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 2 consecutive weeks, including daily shoulder strength and joint motion training. A total of 221 (101 with and 120 without pre-CIMT HSP) middle-aged (median 54 years) persons at sub-acute or chronic phases after stroke were included in the study. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) subscale for pain was used for defining and scoring HSP at passive motion (sum of four directions of movement, maximum 8 points indicating no pain). Passive and active shoulder ROM (sum of flexion and abduction) were assessed. Upper extremity motor function was assessed with B. Lindmark Motor Assessment. Assessments were done pre- and post-CIMT and at 3-month follow-up. Comparisons were stratified by subgroups with- and without HSP.
Results: In the subgroup with pre-CIMT HSP, median HSP score at passive movement was reduced (FMA shoulder pain score increased) from pre- to post-CIMT from 5 points to 7 points post-CIMT, (p < 0.001, Effect size (ES) 0.68). Median active ROM increased from 230° to 308° (p < 0.001, ES 0.72) and median passive ROM increased from 350° to 360° (p < 0.001, ES 0.44). Median motor function improved from 42 to 49 points (p < 0.001, ES 0.92). In the subgroup without pre-CIMT HSP no statistically significant increase of HSP was seen and no clinically significant changes observed for active or passive ROM after CIMT. Median motor function improved from 52 to 56 points (p < 0.001, ES 0.71). All improvements persisted at 3-month follow-up.
Conclusion: CIMT in an outpatient clinical setting may be a feasible treatment to decrease HSP and to improve shoulder ROM and upper extremity motor function among middle-aged persons in the subacute and chronic phases after stroke. Results need to be confirmed in an RCT setting.
No comments:
Post a Comment