Projections of Endovascular Therapy–Eligible Patients With Stroke for the US Population

 This does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to get survivors recovered! How do you plan to get to 100% recovery after this procedure? That's the research needed! Totally useless research, I'd have you all fired! Doesn't anyone in stroke actually think?

Projections of Endovascular Therapy–Eligible Patients With Stroke for the US Population

Eva A. Mistry, MBBS, MSCI mistryea@ucmail.yc.edu, Jane C. Khoury, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8064-6404, Dawn O. Kleindorfer, MD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-3693, Brett M. Kissela, MD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-4013, Kathleen S. Alwell, RN https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-4721, Adam S. Jasne, MD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-3607, Simona Ferioli, MD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-3029, … Show All … , and Pooja Khatri, MD, MSc https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-8266Author Info & Affiliations

Stroke

New online

https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.045766

• 
  

• Abstract
• Graphical Abstract
• Supplemental Material
• eLetters

• Information & Authors
• Metrics & Citations
• View Options
• 
  

Media

• • Share

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

As stroke endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) treatment indications expand, understanding population-based EVT eligibility becomes critical for resource planning. We aimed to project current and future population-based EVT eligibility in the United States.

METHODS:

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the physician-adjudicated GCNKSS (Greater Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Stroke Study; 2015 epoch), a population-based, cross sectional, observational study of stroke incidence, treatment, and outcomes across a 5-county region. All hospitalized patients ≥18 years of age with acute ischemic stroke were ascertained using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 430-436 and Tenth Revision codes I60-I67 and G45-G46 and extrapolated to the US adult census 2020. We determined the rate of EVT eligibility within the GCNKSS population using time from last known well to presentation (0–5 versus 5–23 hours), presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and prestroke modified Rankin Scale. Both conservative and liberal estimates of prevalence of large vessel occlusion and large core were then applied based on literature review (unavailable within the 2015 GCNKSS). This eligibility was then extrapolated to the 2020 US population.

RESULTS:

Of the 1 057 183 adults within GCNKSS in 2015, 2741 had an ischemic stroke and 2176 had data available for analysis. We calculated that 8659 to 17 219 patients (conservative to liberal) meet the current guideline-recommended EVT criteria (nonlarge core, no prestroke disability, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥6) in the United States. Estimates (conservative to liberal) for expanded EVT eligibility subpopulations include (1) 5316 to 10 635 by large core; (2) 10 635 to 21 270 by mild presenting deficits with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score; (3) 13 572 to 27 089 by higher prestroke disability; and (4) 7039 to 14 180 by >1 criteria. These expanded eligibility subpopulations amount to 36 562 to 73 174 patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

An estimated 8659 to 17 219 adult patients in the United States met strict EVT eligibility criteria in 2020. A 4-fold increase in population-based EVT eligibility can be anticipated with incremental adoption of recent or future positive trials. US stroke systems need to be rapidly optimized to handle all EVT-eligible patients with stroke.

Graphical Abstract

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats: