Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Sunday, February 2, 2025

Abstract TP110: Impact of High-Intensity Training on Cardiopulmonary and Lipid Profiles in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

 

Your competent? doctor WILL 100% GUARANTEE that HIT will not cause a stroke? By verifying that your aneurysms will not blow out?

Do you really want to do high intensity training?

Because Andrew Marr blames high-intensity training for his stroke. 

Can too much exercise cause a stroke?

The latest here:

Abstract TP110: Impact of High-Intensity Training on Cardiopulmonary and Lipid Profiles in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Abstract

    Introduction: Cardiovascular comorbidities are highly prevalent in patients who suffer from cerebrovascular disease. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) is a well-established, independent predictor of cardiovascular health and premature mortality. Dyslipidemia also contributes significantly to cardiovascular disease risk. Although previous studies have demonstrated improvements in these parameters with any exercise, the evidence remains inconclusive regarding which exercise intensity offers the greatest benefit. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of high-intensity training (HIT) with other exercise intensities, including moderate intensity (MIT) and usual activity (UA).
    Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies comparing HIT with MIT or UA in stroke patients. We evaluated changes from baseline in VO2 peak, serum LDL, and HDL levels. Additionally, a separate analysis comparing HIT with MIT and UA was conducted for VO2 peak.
    Results: A total of eight studies, involving 338 patients, were included in our analysis, with 163 (48%) of these patients undergoing HIT. The pooled analysis revealed that VO2 peak was significantly higher in the control group compared to the HIT group, with a mean difference (MD) of 2.01 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 0.85-3.18, p < 0.01). Further analysis of four studies comparing HIT with MIT and three studies comparing HIT with UA showed that VO2 peak was significantly higher following MIT (MD 2.03; 95% CI: 0.70-3.35; p < 0.01) and UA (MD 3.73; 95% CI: 0.87-6.59; p = 0.01). A separate analysis of three studies involving 148 patients showed no significant difference in serum LDL levels (MD 0.51; 95% CI: -0.46-1.49; p = 0.30) or serum HDL levels (MD -0.02; 95% CI: -0.16-0.13; p = 0.83).
    Conclusion: High-intensity training, based on a moderate sized pooled sample, does not offer superior advantages in changes from baseline in cardiopulmonary parameters compared to different exercise intensities. Future well-structured randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate different exercise intensities and durations for more definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, the early data seems to indicate that there are no differences between exercise modalities.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment