Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, February 1, 2025

New Tool Predicts Stroke Outcome with 93% Accuracy, Guiding Better Carotid Surgery Decisions

 Will your doctor GUARANTEE no adverse events?

I would never do carotid stenting, way too many possible complications.

Stents were never the permanent solution, they do nothing to address the inflammation in your arteries that creates plaque. And why would you want to put inflexible stents in flexible arteries?  I still don't understand why you would medically need to stent a carotid artery at all if the Circle of Willis is complete. (Unless the whole point is revenue and profit generation) It would seem to make more sense to just close it up and prevent problems from there.  My right carotid artery was closed for 10 years and I cognitively functioned quite well with no episodes of fainting.

Here is why your doctor needs to GUARANTEE NO complications from stenting!

 

 

Restenosis is a gradual re-narrowing of the stented segment that occurs mostly between 3 to 12 months after stent placement

So by not solving the inflammation problem you get this! Stents don't solve the underlying problem, why the fuck is your doctor prescribing them? Money?

New Tool Predicts Stroke Outcome with 93% Accuracy, Guiding Better Carotid Surgery Decisions

Researchers have developed a predictive model with a 93% accuracy rate in determining whether urgent carotid-intervention patients will regain functional independence.

This advanced model uses a data-driven approach that combines 4 critical clinical metrics -- stroke severity, frailty risk score, timing of intervention, and the use of thrombolysis -- to create a real-time decision-making tool. By leveraging these variables, physicians can improve patient care by tailoring treatment plans, optimising intervention timing, and ensuring that the most appropriate patients receive these complex procedures. 

The findings are published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons

“We are entering a new era of stroke care where data-driven insights guide every decision,” said senior author Hernan A. Bazan, MD, chsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana. “By integrating a real-time frailty risk score into the electronic medical record, presenting stroke severity and other variables, we can proactively identify who will benefit from immediate surgery and who may need ‘pre-habilitating’ before surgery to achieve better outcomes.”

Stroke requires timely intervention, with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) increasingly used in select acute carotid-related stroke patients. The researchers aimed to build a model to predict neurologic functional independence (modified Rankin scale [mRS], ≤2) in this high-risk group.

The researchers analysed data from 302 patients who had a stroke and undergoing urgent CEA or CAS between 2015 and 2023 at a tertiary Comprehensive Stroke Center. Predictors included: (1) stroke severity; (2) time to intervention (≤48 hours); (3) thrombolysis use; and (4) frailty risk score. Multiple models were constructed and selected based on the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The primary endpoint was discharge neurological functional independence (mRS ≤2).

Most (78%) patients were discharged functionally independent (mRS ≤2). The combined 30-day rate of stroke, death, and myocardial infarction was 8.3%, and 6.5% for CEA alone and 12.5% for CAS. The model, incorporating thrombolysis, time to intervention, stroke severity (NIHSS), and frailty risk, correctly predicted 93% of functional independence outcomes (area under the curve, 0.808).

“Predicting a patient’s recovery potential with such reliability gives us an unprecedented level of confidence in our treatment decisions,” said Leo Seoane, MD, Ochsner Health. “This innovation ensures that every patient receives the care best suited to their situation, further advancing our commitment to excellence.”

Reference: https://journals.lww.com/journalacs/abstract/9900/precision_in_stroke_care__a_novel_model_for.1125.aspx

SOURCE: Ochsner Health

No comments:

Post a Comment