Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, October 31, 2025

The best approach against cognitive decline in the elderly

 Do you really think your doctor can create the proper protocol on this to prevent cognitive decline post stroke?

You already have 5 lost years of brain cognition due to your stroke, don't let your incompetent? doctor make it worse.

  • cognitive decline (348 posts to December 2011)
  • The best approach against cognitive decline in the elderly

    Prominence

    In a randomized clinical trial of 2,111 older adults at risk for cognitive decline and dementia, a structured lifestyle intervention demonstrated significantly greater benefit on global cognition over two years compared with a self-guided intervention.

    Context

    • Identifying effective interventions to slow or prevent cognitive decline associated with dementia is a public health priority due to the growing number of affected individuals and the profound economic, psychological, and social impacts of the disease.

    • Late cognitive decline is often attributable to mixed pathologies, and effective treatment is likely to require a diversified therapeutic strategy to address the different mechanisms associated with Alzheimer's disease and vascular disease.

    • Recent advances in the use of anti-amyloid antibodies demonstrate evidence of slowing the specific clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease, however, these treatments are only approved for individuals with confirmed disease.

    • Non-pharmacological strategies targeting modifiable risk factors offer a promising, low-cost, accessible, and safe approach with the potential to reduce the incidence of dementia by up to 45%.

    • The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) demonstrated significant cognitive benefit after two years of intervention in multiple domains in older adults at high risk of dementia.

    • The World-Wide FINGERS network was launched in 2017 to promote global collaboration, protocol alignment, and data sharing between non-pharmacological risk reduction trials.

    Methodology

    • Randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial that included 2,111 participants at five clinical sites in the United States, with recruitment from May 2019 to March 2023 and final follow-up until May 14, 2025.

    • Inclusion criteria were defined to select a population at higher risk of cognitive decline, including ages between 60 and 79 years, sedentary lifestyle, and inadequate diet, in addition to at least two other factors such as family history of memory impairment, cardiometabolic risk, race and ethnicity, advanced age, and gender.

    • Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the structured intervention (n = 1,056) or the self-guided intervention (n = 1,055), both of which encouraged increased physical and cognitive activity, a healthy diet, social engagement, and cardiovascular health monitoring.

    • The primary comparison was the difference between the intervention groups in the annual variation in global cognitive function, assessed by a composite measure of executive function, episodic memory, and processing speed, over two years.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment