Assisted Movement With Proprioceptive Stimulation Augments Recovery From Moderate-To-Severe Upper Limb Impairment During Subacute Stroke Period: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Enhance recovery is NOT GOOD ENOUGH!. Survivors want 100% recovery. Do the work necessary to GET THERE! 

Assisted Movement With Proprioceptive Stimulation Augments Recovery From Moderate-To-Severe Upper Limb Impairment During Subacute Stroke Period: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Show all authors

Paul Cordo, PhD, Steven Wolf, PT, PhD, FAPTA, William Z. Rymer, MD, PhD, ...

First Published January 24, 2022 Research Article Find in PubMed 

https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683211063159

Article information

Abstract

Background

Robotic assisted movement has become an accepted method of treating the moderately-to-mildly impaired upper limb after stroke.

Objective

To determine whether, during the subacute phase of recovery, a novel type of robotic assisted training reduces moderate-to-severe impairment in the upper limb beyond that resulting from spontaneous recovery and prescribed outpatient therapy.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, semi-crossover study of 83 participants. Over 6- to 9-weeks, participants received 18, 30-min training sessions of the hand and wrist. The test intervention consisted of assisted motion, biofeedback, and antagonist muscle vibration delivered by a robotic device. Test Group participants received the test intervention, and Control Group participants received a placebo intervention designed to have no effect. Subsequently, Control Group participants crossed over to receive the test intervention.

Results

At enrollment, the average age (±SD) of participants was 57.0 ± 12.8 year and weeks since stroke was 11.6 ± 5.4. The average Fugl-Meyer baseline score of Test Group participants was 20.9, increasing by 10.8 with training, and in Control Group participants was 23.7 increasing by 6.4 with training, representing a significant difference (4.4) in change scores (P = .01). During the crossover phase, Control Group participants showed a significant increase in FMA-UL score (i.e., 4.7 ± 6.7 points, P = .003) as well as in other, more specific measures of impairment.

Conclusions

Robotic impairment-oriented training, as used in this study, can significantly enhance recovery during the subacute phase of recovery. Spontaneous recovery and prescribed outpatient therapy during this phase do not fully exploit the potential for remediating moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment.

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry: NCT00609115–Subacute stroke rehabilitation with AMES

Keywords

stroke, impairment, subacute, assisted movement, AMES,