Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there. Did your doctor somehow miss the recovery protocol that Pedro Bach-y-Rita used to recover fully back in 1958 with only a partial brain?

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label rose colored world. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rose colored world. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

The New Science of Moving Again After a Stroke

 Rose colored world here; not seeing reality!

The New Science of Moving Again After a Stroke

 

Key takeaways

  • Stroke rehabilitation has advanced dramatically in the past 25 years. (What a complete fucking lie! You're no closer to 100% recovery!)
  • Modern rehabilitation focuses on matching therapies to each patient’s specific recovery needs.(Bullshit! You are NOT MAPPING exact protocols to the objective damage diagnosis! You don't even have anything objective in stroke at all! NIHSS and mRS are totally subjective, they can't be used for protocol mapping!) 
  • Devices such as vagus nerve stimulation implants and wearable technologies are expanding options for individualized recovery after stroke.
 Stevie Dickens was 48 years old and living in Vernon Hills, Illinois, when he woke up one September morning in 2003 and couldn’t get off the couch. The night before, while watching football with friends, his speech had begun to slur and he had felt off balance, but didn’t understand that these were warning signs of a stroke. The next morning, he realized he was paralyzed on his right side. A friend’s son had to help him to the floor.

What followed was a yearslong journey through hospitals and rehabilitation centers in which Dickens, a veteran of the Army and the Marine Corps, applied the same mental discipline he had learned in the military to the grinding repetitions of physical therapy. He started in a wheelchair. He graduated to a cane. He eventually discarded the ankle-foot brace strapped around his calf that had helped him walk, after his leg grew strong enough to manage without it. Seeking to push further, he found his way into research.

For nearly two decades Dickens has been a regular participant in motor recovery studies at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab in Chicago. He’s enrolled in walking and arm studies, robotics trials and exoskeleton experiments. “He came in when I came here about 19 years ago,” says Arun Jayaraman, scientific chair for technology and innovation at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. He calls Dickens' experience “a classic clinical scenario.” He was “super impaired when he came in.”

Today, at 71, Dickens walks with a cane. He cooks, mows the lawn and goes to stores. “I understand I ain’t gonna get 100 percent back,” he says. “But I’m gonna get at least 90 percent.”

Intense, repetitive practice

Dickens is a living demonstration of how far the field has come. When he had his stroke, most of what is now available to stroke survivors didn’t exist.

The transformation has been driven largely by more sophisticated understanding of how the injured brain recovers and by technologies that enable clinicians and researchers to apply that understanding in precise new ways.

When a stroke damages the neural circuits that govern movement, the signals that once flowed from brain to muscle at full strength through thousands of fibers are suddenly diminished, rerouted and degraded. The goal of modern rehab is to amplify whatever signal remains — stimulating the nervous system along the injured pathway or pushing the brain to find alternative routes. At the same time, coupling that stimulation to the intense, repetitive, task-specific practice that drives the reforming of brain networks.

In one recent study, Dickens wore a robotic device called an exoskeleton. It’s a powered frame that fits over the limbs and torso and moves the wearer’s body through programmed or guided motions. In stroke rehab, exoskeletons are used to move paralyzed or weakened limbs through repetitive walking and movement patterns to exploit the brain’s neuroplasticity and help rebuild motor pathways. In the study, published earlier this year in Science Robotics, researchers from the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and Northwestern University introduced what they call therapist-exoskeleton-patient interaction. A therapist and a stroke survivor each wear a lower-limb exoskeleton, the two systems virtually linked at the hips and knees, so that the therapist can guide the patient’s walking through their own leg movements. 

The approach produced greater joint range of motion and increased step length and height compared to conventional therapy, while requiring less physical effort from the therapist.

“By combining the hands-on adaptability of physical therapy with the scalability and precision of robotic systems,” says Lorenzo Vianello, a postdoctoral researcher at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab who coauthored the study, “it can enable more comprehensive whole-body gait training without requiring multiple therapists, while also introducing real-time responsiveness to patient performance.” For patients, that translates to a workout that adjusts to them stride by stride.

Stimulating the vagus nerve

For upper limb recovery — restoring function to a paralyzed arm or hand — one of the most significant developments in recent years has been the Vivistim Paired VNS System, which received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in 2021 and became commercially available in 2022. The device, about the size of a small pacemaker, is implanted in the upper chest; a connected lead is implanted against the vagus nerve on the left side of the neck.

During rehab sessions, electrical stimulation pulses through the nerve each time the patient performs a prescribed arm movement. The stimulation triggers the release of brain chemicals that promote synaptic plasticity — essentially telling the brain to pay particular attention to whatever it is doing at that moment and to strengthen the connections within the networks of brain cells involved in performing the task.

In the pivotal clinical trial, published in The Lancet in 2021, patients receiving vagus stimulation during rehab showed two to three times more improvement in upper limb function than those receiving rehabilitation alone; long-term follow-up data published in 2025 found that 66 percent of patients achieved sustained, clinically meaningful improvements at a one-year check.

The pace of development across the field is striking. Jayaraman describes a suite of wearable sensors now being deployed at the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab that can assess a stroke patient’s walking ability in minutes and generate, at the time of admission, a prediction of their likely recovery trajectory for up to a year.

Lightweight robotic exoskeletons can be worn to the grocery store. Shoes with variable-friction soles — which glide when a wearer can’t lift their foot and grip when they put weight on the shoe — were studied by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab researchers and are now sold commercially. They can potentially correct functional balance and stability issues caused by foot drop, dramatically reducing fall risk.

Thursday, January 7, 2016

Alzheimer’s Disease: A Future Epidemic

And if our fucking failures of stroke associations were any good at all they would have similar articles published. But no, all is well in the rose colored world of the stroke associations. F.A.S.T. and tPA are working great, we just need more awareness so F.A.S.T. and tPA can either prevent or solve all strokes. The blinders are large in our stroke associations, I blame the boards of directors for not setting goals correctly. 

Alzheimer’s Disease: A Future Epidemic


UCLA biostatistics team forecasts prevalence of the disease under different circumstances.
We’re living longer. The number of U.S. adults 65 and older — roughly 40 million as of the 2010 census — is expected to nearly double to 71 million by 2030 and to reach 98 million by 2060. In much of the rest of the world, the story is the same. But if the aging trend illustrates the success of public health strategies, it also raises the specter of a major public health crisis — a sharp rise in the number of people living with Alzheimer’s disease.
Ron Brookmeyer, a professor in the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health’s Department of Biostatistics, has called attention to the looming Alzheimer’s epidemic through widely cited studies in which he has employed sophisticated computer models to project the number of cases, as well as the potential positive impact of future therapies and other strategies to prevent or delay the onset and progression of symptoms.
Brookmeyer’s work in this arena began nearly 20 years ago with a paper he wrote in the American Journal of Public Health projecting that the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States would nearly quadruple by the middle of this century, by which time approximately 1 in 45 Americans will be afflicted. His 2007 study also projected that 1 in 85 persons worldwide will be living with the disease by 2050, with nearly half of them requiring a level of care equivalent to that of a nursing home.
Brookmeyer’s development of statistical models to make forecasts on epidemics began in the late 1980s with HIV/AIDS, but after becoming involved in a study on aging, he turned his attention to the threat posed by Alzheimer’s disease. “Obviously it’s not a transmissible epidemic like the ones I had been looking at, but with the aging of the population, it was clear that the numbers were going to explode,” he explains.
As part of his modeling, Brookmeyer and his colleagues consider both demographic trends and the severity of the progression of the disease. “This is a long illness,” he says. “Once you’re diagnosed, you might live with it for 10 or more years, and the intensity of the care required will vary during that time. From a public health point of view, it’s very important to look at where people will be in different stages of the disease and the needs we will be facing as a society.”
Through a systematic review of Alzheimer’s studies, Brookmeyer’s team has found that the rate of being diagnosed with the disease doubles every five years in older populations. For example, the likelihood of a diagnosis at age 77 is approximately 1 percent; by age 82 it is 2 percent, and at age 87 it is 4 percent. This rate of increase with aging is consistent across the world. Combining those factors with trends in other causes of aging-related mortality, such as cardiovascular disease and cancer, the group forecasts the future prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease.
Equally important, the modeling also allows Brookmeyer and colleagues to factor in the future impact of advances in Alzheimer’s disease prevention and treatment — what Brookmeyer calls “what if” scenarios.
“What if we could delay the onset of the disease for a few years?” he says. “In an aging population, even modest advances could be home runs in terms of their public health impact.” For example, Brookmeyer has found that if an intervention could delay the average disease onset by even a single year, it would reduce by 9 million the number of projected worldwide cases by mid-century.
Brookmeyer is currently working with researchers at UC Irvine on a study of “the oldest old” — persons over the age of 90, the fastest- growing segment of the U.S. population — to better understand the predictors of successful aging and factors that might protect against dementia. The study follows a cohort of individuals living in a retirement center who, as far back as the 1980s, began filling out detailed questionnaires designed to capture lifestyle characteristics. “Over the next 50 years in the U.S., the over-90 population is going to grow six-fold, so this is a very important group to understand when it comes to the issue of dementia,” Brookmeyer says.
While Brookmeyer’s projections of the increase in Alzheimer’s paint a bleak picture, given the current state of prevention and treatment, he points out that recent developments in the field offer plenty of room for optimism.
There have been new insights into how the disease develops, as well as the identification of new biomarkers that can assist in diagnosing Alzheimer’s and tracking the impact of potential therapies. “Among the most promising interventions currently under investigation are those that target the buildup of amyloid beta proteins in an effort to slow the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s,” Brookmeyer says.
Diagram shows growing number of alzheimer's cases over time.