Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label intracerebral hemorrhage risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intracerebral hemorrhage risk. Show all posts

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Linked to Fewer Brain Bleeds

 But this suggests otherwise;

Has your doctor factually analyzed this and given you EXACT REASONS FOR YOUR TREATMENT?

A friend of mine refused to go on the new anticoagulants(circa2008) because of the lack of a reversal drug. Be careful out there.


Direct Oral Anticoagulants Linked to Fewer Brain Bleeds

TOPLINE:

Among patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs), the use of direct OACs (DOACs) was associated with lower rates of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) than the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), without an increase in the incidence of population‑level ICH over time.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Researchers conducted an observational study to examine how changes in prescribing OACs were associated with hospital admissions for OAC-related ICH.
  • The study compared two 5‑year cohorts: a pre‑DOAC era (2005-2009), during which all OAC use comprised VKAs, and a transition‑to‑DOAC era (2015-2019), reflecting an increasing uptake of DOACs.
  • The analysis included 917 patients from the pre-DOAC era and 1002 patients from the transition-to-DOAC era, all of whom were permanent residents of Southern Finland and admitted with an index event of non‑traumatic ICH confirmed by medical records and brain imaging.
  • ICH was attributed to VKA treatment if the international normalised ratio was less than 2.0 on admission, and DOAC-related ICH was confirmed through medical records, ie, patient-/caregiver-confirmed medication use or anti-Xa assay, or electronic medication registry data.
  • Population‑level data on dispensed OACs were obtained annually from national pharmacy reimbursement registries.

TAKEAWAY:

  • During 2005-2009, 12.5% of ICH events were related to the use of OACs (all associated with VKAs); however, during 2015-2019, 18% of ICH events were related to the use of OACs, of which 27% were related to DOACs. The annual incidence of ICH was 12 per 100,000 inhabitants in both the cohorts.
  • During 2015-2019, the annual incidence of ICH was 5.4 per 10,000 DOAC users, representing a 34.2% lower incidence rate than VKA users (P = .011); however, the annual incidence of ICH did not differ significantly between the two cohorts for VKA users.
  • After multivariable adjustments, the use of DOACs was associated with a 52.7% lower rate of ICH than the use of VKAs (P < .001).

IN PRACTICE:

"Our findings support the superior safety profile of DOACs compared with VKAs. With less restrictive compensation policies for DOACs, switching from VKAs to DOACs when clinically appropriate should eventually result in fewer OAC patients experiencing ICH," the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

This study was led by Liisa Tomppo, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. It was published online on April 06, 2026, in Annals of Medicine.

LIMITATIONS:

The study was limited to a single tertiary hospital, potentially missing a small number of residents hospitalised elsewhere or highly frail patients admitted to local facilities. Due to the retrospective nature, DOAC treatment adherence was verified from medical and prescription records rather than laboratory tests, introducing potential misclassification. The study lacked data on the dose, duration, and exact indications of DOACs.

DISCLOSURES:

This study received support from Boehringer Ingelheim. One author declared receiving a non-significant unrestricted research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals.

Suggested for you

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Thursday, December 8, 2022

Association Between Statin Use and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location: A Nested Case-Control Registry Study

 This is probably not going to help hemorrhage risk post tPA treatment since they refer to longer duration use. 

Association Between Statin Use and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location: A Nested Case-Control Registry Study

Nils Jensen Boe, Stine Munk Hald, Mie Micheelsen Jensen, Jonas Asgaard Bojsen, Mohammad Talal Elhakim, Sandra Florisson, Alisa Saleh, Anne Clausen, Sören Möller, Frederik Severin Gråe Harbo, Ole Graumann, Jesper Hallas, Luis Alberto García Rodríguez, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Larry B. Goldstein, David Gaist

Abstract

Background: A causal relationship between statin use and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is uncertain. We hypothesized that an association between long-term statin exposure and ICH risk might vary for different ICH locations.

Methods: We conducted this analysis using linked Danish nationwide registries. Within the Southern Denmark Region (population 1.2 million), we identified all first-ever cases of ICH between 2009-2018 in persons ages >55 years. Patients with medical record verified diagnoses were classified as having a lobar or non-lobar ICH and matched for age, sex, and calendar year to general population controls. We used a nationwide prescription registry to ascertain prior statin and other medication use that we classified for recency, duration, and intensity. Using conditional logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for the risk of lobar and non-lobar ICH.

Results: We identified 989 patients with lobar ICH (52.2% women, mean age 76.3-years) who we matched to 39,500 controls, and 1,175 patients with non-lobar ICH (46.5% women, mean age 75.1-years) who we matched to 46,755 controls. Current statin use was associated with a lower risk of lobar (aOR 0.83; 95%CI, 0.70-0.98) and non-lobar ICH (aOR 0.84; 95%CI, 0.72-0.98). Longer duration of statin use was also associated with lower risk of lobar (<1 year: aOR 0.89; 95%CI, 0.69-1.14; ≥1 year to <5years aOR 0.89; 95%CI 0.73-1.09; ≥5 years aOR 0.67; 95%CI, 0.51-0.87; p for trend 0.040) and non-lobar ICH (<1 year: aOR1.00; 95%CI, 0.80-1.25; ≥1 year to <5years aOR 0.88; 95%CI 0.73-1.06; ≥5 years aOR 0.62; 95%CI, 0.48-0.80; p for trend <0.001). Estimates stratified by statin intensity were similar to the main estimates for low-medium intensity therapy (lobar aOR 0.82; non-lobar aOR 0.84); the association with high intensity therapy was neutral.

Discussion: We found that statin use was associated with a lower risk of ICH, particularly with longer treatment duration. This association did not vary by hematoma location.

  • Received August 29, 2022.
  • Accepted in final form October 24, 2022.

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

Validation and comparison of multiple risk scores for prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis in VISTA

So you described a problem but did no searching for solutions to that problem. Incomplete work, and your mentors and senior researchers allowed you to hand in incomplete work? All of you need to be fired. 

Validation and comparison of multiple risk scores for prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis in VISTA

First Published May 30, 2022 Research Article 

Background and Aims 

Prediction models/scores may help to identify patients at high risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. We aimed to validate and compare the performance of different prediction models for sICH after thrombolysis using direct model estimation in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA).

Methods 

We searched PubMed for potentially eligible prediction models from inception to June 1, 2019. Simple and practical models/scores were validated in VISTA. The primary outcome was sICH based on two criteria (National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, NINDS; Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study, SITS-MOST) and the secondary outcome was parenchymal hematoma (PH). The discrimination performance of each model was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and calibration.

Results 

We found 13 prediction models and five models (HAT, MSS, SPAN-100, GRASPS and THRIVE) were finally validated in VISTA. A total of 1884 participants were eligible for our study, of whom the proportion with sICH was 4.6% (87/1884) per NINDS and 3.9% (73/1884) per SITS-MOST, and with PH was 11.3% (213/1884). MSS and GRASPS had the greatest predictive ability for sICH (NINDS criteria: MSS AUC 0.7 95%CI 0.63-0.77, P<0.001; GRASPS AUC 0.69 95%CI 0.63-0.76, P<0.001; SITS-MOST criteria: MSS, AUC 0.76 95%CI 0.68-0.85, P<0.001; GRASPS, AUC 0.79 95%CI 0.71-0.87, P<0.001). Similar results were found for PH (MSS AUC 0.68 95%CI 0.64-0.73, P=0.017; GRASPS AUC 0.68 95%CI 0.63-0.72, P=0.017). The calibration of each model was almost good.

Conclusion 

MSS and GRASPS had good disclination and calibration for sICH and PH after thrombolysis as assessed in VISTA. These two models could be used in clinical practice and clinical trials to identity individuals with high risk of sICH.