Introduction
Ischemic stroke is one of the most severe neurological disorders and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide (1, 2).
The main reasons of deterioration were neurological complications
including severe brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation, which may
share the common pathophysiological mechanism of blood–brain barrier
(BBB) breakdown (3).
At present, neuroimaging tests are the main method for diagnosing
severe brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation, but these tests are
usually performed in the presence of signs of neurological worsening.
The neuroimaging tests may delay the effective treatment. Given the
limitations of current methods for early detection, new methods are
needed to identify these two neurological complications in order to
optimize timing of management administration (4).
A change of biomarker levels may precede the appearance
of clinical deterioration. Clinical studies have identified that
biomarkers of BBB breakdown, such as matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9)
and S100-B, may be associated with clinical deterioration (5–8). Among these biomarkers, MMP-9 has sparked the most interest (9).
MMP-9 belongs to a family of zinc-dependent proteolytic enzymes. In
animal models, MMP-9 is upregulated in the cerebral ischemic area (10) and degrades the basal lamina around blood vessels in the brain including type IV collagen, fibronectins, and lamina (11–13).
As the substrate of MMP-9, fibronectins are located between cell and
cell or matrix and consist of cellular fibronectin (c-Fn) and plasma
fibronectin (p-Fn). C-Fn is situated nearly exclusively in the
endothelium and increases rapidly when vascular damage occurs (14, 15).
After stroke onset, high levels of MMP-9 and c-Fn may represent severe
damage of the neurovascular unit in injured brain tissue, and when
reperfusion begins in the occluded vessels, the disruption of the
extracellular matrix may further cause BBB leakage, brain edema, and
even hemorrhagic complications in the infarction area (16).
No uniform conclusions have been drawn thus far about
associations of circulating MMP-9 levels with the risk of severe brain
edema, hemorrhagic transformation, and poor outcome after acute ischemic
stroke. Previous systematic reviews suggested a correlation between
MMP-9 levels and risk of hemorrhagic transformation (17, 18).
While a recent study did not indicate that MMP-9 plasma concentrations
were associated with any outcomes including symptomatic intracerebral
hemorrhage (sICH), death, and functional outcome (19).
Besides, studies focused on c-Fn are very limited, although one study
suggested a device that quantified the c-Fn levels was able to stratify
patients who developed hemorrhagic transformation (20).
In addition, previous studies reported that MMP-9 gene polymorphism,
especially the rs3918242 polymorphism (at−1562 locus C/T), regulates
expression and thereby influences the levels of circulating MMP-9 (21).
Stroke patients with the CT and TT genotypes had significantly higher
MMP-9 levels than those with the CC genotypes at the rs3918242
polymorphism (22). MMP-9 rs3918242 polymorphism has already been associated with stroke susceptibility (23–25);
however, it is unclear whether or not MMP-9 rs3918242 polymorphism is
associated with stroke outcome. Considering these limitations, we aimed
to systematically review all the relevant data to investigate (1)
whether circulating MMP-9 levels and c-Fn levels might constitute
markers of severe brain edema, hemorrhagic transformation, and poor
outcome after ischemic stroke; (2) whether variations in the MMP-9
rs3918242 gene were associated with susceptibility to severe brain
edema, hemorrhagic transformation, and poor outcome after ischemic
stroke.