Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there. Did your doctor somehow miss the recovery protocol that Pedro Bach-y-Rita used to recover fully back in 1958 with only a partial brain?

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label microthrombi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label microthrombi. Show all posts

Thursday, August 7, 2025

Revealing the microvascular thrombosis with nature-inspired self-assembly of iron oxide nanoparticles

 Your competent? doctor and hospital identified treatment protocols on microthrombi from all the research on COVID-19 throwing off lots of microthrombi, right? Oh no, THEY DID NOTHING! You need to get all of them fired!
  • microthrombi (9 posts to May 2020)
  • Revealing the microvascular thrombosis with nature-inspired self-assembly of iron oxide nanoparticles


    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2025.102245Get rights and content
    During ischemic stroke treatments, blood clots may be fragmented into very small pieces called microthrombi that are associated with consequent brain damage. Treating these microthrombi is an important medical challenge, because they are, in general, invisible with current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods. Researchers from the University of Caen, France pioneered a very powerful MRI diagnostic probe based on a nature-inspired self assembly of iron oxide nanoparticles that are able to reveal the presence of these microthrombi with great efficiency and specificity.

    Section snippets

    Main text

    Stroke, and in particular, acute ischemic stroke (85% of cases), is a huge medical challenge. They are reported to be the second leading cause of death in the world and the third one considering death and disability combined.1
    Current treatments of the blood clot formed during ischemic stroke generally involve the intravenous administration of thrombolytic recombinant enzymes of tissue plasminogen activators (rtPA) such as alteplase or tenecteplase.2 Another growing method is the mechanical

    Acknowledgments

    This work is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant ANR-24-CE18-1966-ISCHeMAG).

    Saturday, October 17, 2020

    COVID Heart Autopsies Point More to Clot Damage Than Myocarditis — Results bolster case for anticoagulation in hospitalized patients

     In my opinion this is wrong, wrong, wrong! You don't wait for anti-coagulation after you are hospitalized. You get it immediately after your diagnosis.

    I'm not medically trained so I know nothing, don't listen to me.

    The latest here:

    COVID Heart Autopsies Point More to Clot Damage Than Myocarditis - Results bolster case for anticoagulation in hospitalized patients

    A careful look at the heart after death from COVID-19 suggested cardiac damage was common, but more from clotting than inflammation, researchers reported.

    Autopsies on 40 people who died of COVID-19 showed that 14 had cardiac injury as indicated by myocardial necrosis: an acute myocardial infarction of at least 1 cm2 in three (7.5%) and smaller focal myocyte necrosis in 11 (27.5%).

    Microthrombi were frequent, whereas none of those patients had myocarditis, except sarcoid involvement in one case, reported Giulio Guagliumi, MD, of Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII in Bergamo, Italy, and colleagues at the virtual TCT Connect meeting.

    Epicardial coronary artery thrombosis was found in two of the myocardial necrosis patients (14.2%) and microthrombi in nine (64.3%).

    "We did not expect this," said study co-author Renu Virmani, MD, of CVPath Institute in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The first case that prompted this investigation was one that presented with more intramyocardial capillary thrombi than she had ever seen.

    "That alerted us so we made a concerted effort to look by multiple sections. We took as much as 10 sections from the myocardium, from every wall, from two levels so that we would not miss these things," she said at the session. "That's what led us to discover that there's more than just troponin I rise but really more to do with the fact that there is true necrosis and not so much myocarditis."

    Ischemic EKG changes had been present in more of the myocardial necrosis cases (43% vs 8% without necrosis, P=0.03) and 44% of those with microthrombi. Notably, though, the virus was detected in the heart for only nine patients (22.5%), with no difference by myocardial necrosis or microthrombi presence.

    "It seems to be unlikely that the direct viral invasion of the heart is playing a major role in making myocardial necrosis and microthrombi," Guagliumi told the virtual audience.

    The microthrombi were rich in platelets, fibrin II, and complement activation terminal products.

    "New targeted therapeutic approaches are needed for the prevention and treatment of cardiac injury of the patients with COVID-19 disease," Guagliumi concluded.

    Yet there are important implications for treatment now as well, commented session co-chair Timothy Henry, MD, of The Christ Hospital in Cincinnati.

    "The prothrombotic aspect of acute coronary syndromes in patients who are COVID-positive [is] becoming increasingly clear," he told MedPage Today. "We know that in patients ST elevation- and COVID-positive there's a higher percentage of people that have no clear culprit, so you go [to angiography] and they have normal coronary arteries. A lot of people are considering that myocarditis."

    But that now appears to be relatively rare, he said. "It's more likely to be microthrombi. I think that's a really important point, because influenza for example has more endocarditis. People need to be aware of the importance of microthrombi."

    For ST-elevation patients without obstructive disease, he said, "typically we just stop, and we don't do anything else. Should we treat them differently? And even if they do have epicardial disease, they still [might] have microthrombi."

    Session discussion panelist Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, noted that the pathology findings help in answering the key question: "Is this predominantly platelets or is this predominant of fibrin?"

    Virmani noted that both were found, "but I was more impressed by the fibrin." Transmission electron microscopy in a few cases showed fibrin much more prominently, she said.

    "I think this really makes us focus on anticoagulating these patients," commented panelist Mamas Mamas, BMBCh, of Keele University in Keele, England.(And if you do it as soon as diagnosed then you might not even see them as hospital patients or morgue candidates.)

    Henry also raised the question of intracoronary lysis for persistent ST elevation and no epicardial disease. "I'm not sure what to do with them," he said. "We know that they have higher mortality. It's clearly a problem that needs to be solved."

    Virmani suggested that troponin elevation beyond 1 ng/dL might help guide that decision.

    Individualized decisions, taking into account complicating factors like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or intubation, will be important, Henry agreed.

    "In real time, having been on STEMI call here in New York during the pandemic, it is difficult to use any kind of threshold of a biomarker because it is such a dynamic process and resource allocation becomes a really big part of our strategy for management," cautioned session co-chair Sahil Parikh, MD, of NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center in New York City. "For patients with extensive LV dysfunction, those are the ones I would target, and other patients I would try to ride them out with anticoagulants."

    Henry's North American COVID Myocardial Infarction Registry (NACMI) will follow patients out 1 year to help determine true incidence of lasting cardiac damage. "But part of the problem with myocardial damage is I don't know [whether] you can distinguish from an MRI very easily an infarction from widespread microthrombi versus myocarditis," Henry said. "I think that might be difficult to tell the difference."

    In the autopsy series, diffuse alveolar damage turned up in nearly all of the lungs examined, with pulmonary artery thrombus in nearly half and microthrombi in the alveolar septa in about a quarter.

    Another presentation showed proof of concept that microvascular lung thrombosis could be diagnosed with invasive optical coherence tomography in COVID-19 patients with high D-dimer levels even CT scans were negative for pulmonary embolism.

    Parikh noted that such a strategy could be useful "perhaps as a diagnostic test for some of these unexplained dyspneic patients who are post-COVID-19 without any sort of either macro manifestations on imaging or clinically that explain their dyspnea."

    However, he cautioned that this approach could have practical challenges and risk damage to vessels that are too small or too short.

     

    Monday, August 17, 2020

    Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19

    Get treated, staying home does nothing.  

    I'm still going to be requesting heparin or Lovenox shots immediately because I don't want all the microthrombi circulating  in my blood causing all kinds of havoc. But don't listen to me, I'm not medically trained. 

    I'm going to be asking for heparin as a blood thinner because of this:

    Common FDA-approved drug may effectively neutralize virus that causes COVID-19

    The latest here:

    Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19

    Angelo Carfì, MD1; Roberto Bernabei, MD1; Francesco Landi, MD, PhD1; et al for the Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group
    JAMA. 2020;324(6):603-605. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.12603

    In Italy, a large proportion of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presented with symptoms (71.4% of 31 845 confirmed cases as of June 3, 2020).1 Common symptoms include cough, fever, dyspnea, musculoskeletal symptoms (myalgia, joint pain, fatigue), gastrointestinal symptoms, and anosmia/dysgeusia.2-4 However, information is lacking on symptoms that persist after recovery. We assessed persistent symptoms in patients who were discharged from the hospital after recovery from COVID-19.

    Methods

    In the waning phase of the pandemic, beginning on April 21, 2020, the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS in Rome, Italy, established a postacute outpatient service for individuals discharged from the hospital after recovery from COVID-19. All patients who met World Health Organization criteria for discontinuation of quarantine (no fever for 3 consecutive days, improvement in other symptoms, and 2 negative test results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] 24 hours apart) were followed up. At enrollment in the study, real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 was performed and patients with a negative test result were included.

    Patients were offered a comprehensive medical assessment with detailed history and physical examination. Data on all clinical characteristics, including clinical and pharmacological history, lifestyle factors, vaccination status, and body measurements, were collected in a structured electronic data collection system. The COVID-19 postacute outpatient service is currently active, and further details about the patient evaluation protocol are described elsewhere.5

    In particular, data on specific symptoms potentially correlated with COVID-19 were obtained using a standardized questionnaire administered at enrollment. Patients were asked to retrospectively recount the presence or absence of symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19 and whether each symptom persisted at the time of the visit. More than 1 symptom could be reported. The EuroQol visual analog scale was used to ask patients to score their quality of life from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health) before COVID-19 and at the time of the visit. A difference of 10 points defined worsened quality of life. All analyses were performed using R version 3.6.3 (R Foundation).

    This study was approved by the Università Cattolica and Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS Institutional Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Results

    From April 21 to May 29, 2020, 179 patients were potentially eligible for the follow-up post–acute care assessment; 14 individuals (8%) refused to participate and 22 had a positive test result. Thus, 143 patients were included. The mean age was 56.5 (SD, 14.6) years (range, 19-84 years), and 53 (37%) were women. During hospitalization, 72.7% of participants had evidence of interstitial pneumonia. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.5 (SD, 9.7) days; 21 patients (15%) received noninvasive ventilation and 7 patients (5%) received invasive ventilation. The characteristics of the study population are summarized in the Table.

    Patients were assessed a mean of 60.3 (SD, 13.6) days after onset of the first COVID-19 symptom; at the time of the evaluation, only 18 (12.6%) were completely free of any COVID-19–related symptom, while 32% had 1 or 2 symptoms and 55% had 3 or more. None of the patients had fever or any signs or symptoms of acute illness. Worsened quality of life was observed among 44.1% of patients. The Figure shows that a high proportion of individuals still reported fatigue (53.1%), dyspnea (43.4%), joint pain, (27.3%) and chest pain (21.7%).

    Discussion

    This study found that in patients who had recovered from COVID-19, 87.4% reported persistence of at least 1 symptom, particularly fatigue and dyspnea. Limitations of the study include the lack of information on symptom history before acute COVID-19 illness and the lack of details on symptom severity. Furthermore, this is a single-center study with a relatively small number of patients and without a control group of patients discharged for other reasons. Patients with community-acquired pneumonia can also have persistent symptoms, suggesting that these findings may not be exclusive to COVID-19.6

    Clinicians and researchers have focused on the acute phase of COVID-19, but continued monitoring after discharge for long-lasting effects is needed

     

    USC scientists identify the order of COVID-19’s symptoms

     I can see zero reason for self-isolating, you are just hoping against hope that you will not get a severe case. 

    I'm still going to be requesting heparin or Lovenox shots immediately because I don't want all the microthrombi circulating  in my blood causing all kinds of havoc. But don't listen to me, I'm not medically trained. 

    I'm going to be asking for heparin as a blood thinner because of this:

    Common FDA-approved drug may effectively neutralize virus that causes COVID-19

    The latest here:

    USC scientists identify the order of COVID-19’s symptoms

     
    University of Southern California Health News|August 14, 2020

    USC researchers have found what appears to be the likely order in which COVID-19 symptoms first appear: fever, cough and muscle pain, then nausea and/or vomiting, then diarrhea.

    Knowing the order of COVID-19’s symptoms may help patients seek care promptly or decide promptly to self-isolate, the scientists say. It also could help doctors rule out other illnesses or plan how to treat patients, according to the study led by doctoral candidate Joseph Larsen and his colleagues with faculty advisers Peter Kuhn and James Hicks at the USC Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience’s Convergent Science Institute in Cancer.

    The scientific findings were published in the journal Frontiers in Public Health.

    “This order is especially important to know when we have overlapping cycles of illnesses like the flu that coincide with infections of COVID-19,” said Kuhn, professor of medicine, biomedical engineering, and aerospace and mechanical engineering at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences. “Doctors can determine what steps to take to care for the patient, and they may prevent the patient’s condition from worsening.”


    “Given that there are now better approaches to treatments for COVID-19, identifying patients earlier could reduce hospitalization time,” said Larsen, the study’s lead author and a USC Dornsife professor.

    Determining COVID-19 symptoms can help doctors plan treatments accordingly

    Fever and cough are frequently associated with a variety of respiratory illnesses, including Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). But the timing and symptoms in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract set COVID-19 apart.

    “The upper GI tract (i.e., nausea/vomiting) seems to be affected before the lower GI tract (i.e., diarrhea) in COVID-19, which is the opposite from MERS and SARS,” the scientists wrote.

    The authors predicted the order of symptoms this spring from the rates of symptom incidence of more than 55,000 confirmed coronavirus cases in China, all of which were collected from Feb. 16-24 by the World Health Organization. They also studied a dataset of nearly 1,100 cases collected from Dec. 11-Jan. 29 by the China Medical Treatment Expert Group via the National Health Commission of China.

    To compare the order of COVID-19 symptoms to influenza, the researchers examined data from 2,470 cases in North America, Europe and the Southern Hemisphere that were reported to health authorities from 1994 to 1998.

    “The order of the symptoms matter. Knowing that each illness progresses differently means that doctors can identify sooner whether someone likely has COVID-19, or another illness, which can help them make better treatment decisions,” Larsen said.


    To read more, click here

    Saturday, June 27, 2020

    Cerebral ischemic and hemorrhagic complications of coronavirus disease 2019

    You did not do timely intervention, I'm sure you didn't start anti-coagulation therapies IMMEDIATELY upon diagnosis of COVID-19, you waited until the LVO had already occurred. And you falsely think reperfusion is the correct endpoint. I'm going to demand anti-coagulation IMMEDIATELY UPON DIAGNOSIS, I don't care what the fuck my doctor thinks. I'm not going to die just because clinical results haven't been published.  You obviously can't listen to me, I'm not medically trained. 

    This statement from research is why I'm so adamant about this:

    The autopsies of lungs showed lots of alveolar(lungs) capillary microthrombi were 9 times as prevalent in patients with Covid-19 as in patients with influenza.

    Cerebral ischemic and hemorrhagic complications of coronavirus disease 2019

    Ahmad Sweid1, Batoul Hammoud2, Kimon Bekelis3, Symeon Missios3, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris1, Michael R Gooch1, Nabeel A Herial1, Hekmat Zarzour1, Victor Romo4, Maureen DePrince1, Robert H Rosenwasser1 and Pascal Jabbour1

    Abstract 

    Background: 
    The coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with neurological manifestations including stroke.
    Objectives: 
    We present a case series of coronavirus disease 2019 patients from two institutions with acute cerebrovascular pathologies. In addition, we present a pooled analysis of published data on large vessel occlusion in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 and a concise summary of the pathophysiology of acute cerebrovascular disease in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019.
    Methods: A retrospective study across two institutions was conducted between 20 March 2020 and 20 May 2020, for patients developing acute cerebrovascular disease and diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. We performed a literature review using the PubMed search engine.
    Results: 
    The total sample size was 22 patients. The mean age was 59.5 years, and 12 patients were female. The cerebrovascular pathologies were 17 cases of acute ischemic stroke, 3 cases of aneurysm rupture, and 2 cases of sinus thrombosis. Of the stroke and sinus thrombosis patients, the mean National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 13.8 8.0, and 16 (84.2%) patients underwent a mechanical thrombectomy procedure. A favorable thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score was achieved in all patients. Of the 16 patients that underwent a mechanical thrombectomy, the mortality incidence was five (31.3%). Of all patients (22), three (13.6%) patients developed hemorrhagic conversion requiring decompressive surgery. Eleven (50%) patients had a poor functional status (modified Rankin Score 3–6) at discharge, and the total mortality incidence was eight (36.4%).
    Conclusions: 
    Despite timely intervention and favorable reperfusion, the mortality rate in coronavirus disease 2019 patients with large vessel occlusion was high in our series and in the pooled analysis. Notable features were younger age group, involvement of both the arterial and venous vasculature, multivessel involvement, and complicated procedures due to the clot consistency and burden.



    Friday, June 19, 2020

    Neuropathological Features of Covid-19

    Interesting that the acute hypoxic injury is not large enough to be called stroke, probably because it is diffused throughout the brain and would never show up in a CT or MRI scan.  Also that the autopsies of lungs showed lots of alveolar(lungs) capillary microthrombi were 9 times as prevalent in patients with Covid-19 as in patients with influenza. So lots of thrombi in the lungs but not in the brain, something doesn't sound right here. This means that my massive anti-coagulation strategy needs to be immediately applied after diagnosis

     

    Neuropathological Features of Covid-19

    To the Editor:

    Neurologic symptoms, including headache, altered mental status, and anosmia, occur in many patients with Covid-19.1-3 We report the neuropathological findings from autopsies of 18 consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who died in a single teaching hospital between April 14 and April 29, 2020.
    All the patients had nasopharyngeal swab samples that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on qualitative reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assays. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 53 to 75), and 14 patients (78%) were men. The presenting neurologic symptoms were myalgia (in 3 patients), headache (in 2), and decreased taste (in 1). Coexisting conditions included diabetes mellitus (in 12 patients), hypertension (in 11), cardiovascular disease (in 5), hyperlipidemia (in 5), chronic kidney disease (in 4), prior stroke (in 4), dementia (in 4), and treated anaplastic astrocytoma (in 1) (see Tables S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org).
    The patients had presented a median of 2 days (interquartile range, 0 to 5) after the onset of the first symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and were hospitalized for a median of 6 days (interquartile range, 2 to 9) before death (Fig. S1A); 11 received mechanical ventilation. According to a retrospective chart review by neurologists, all the patients had a confusional state or decreased arousal from sedation for ventilation. Brain magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalographic imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid examinations were not performed. Cranial computed tomography without contrast was performed in 3 patients and showed no acute abnormalities; the tumor resection cavity in the patient with a known anaplastic astrocytoma was seen.
    Table 1. Gross Findings and Results of Histologic Analysis to Detect SARS-CoV-2.
    Death occurred 0 to 32 days after the onset of symptoms (median, 8 days; mean, 10 days). Autopsies were performed in a uniform manner with sampling of 10 standard brain areas. Specimens were fixed in formalin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, as described in the Materials and Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix. Gross inspection showed atherosclerosis in 14 brain specimens but no acute stroke, herniation, or olfactory bulb damage. Residual anaplastic astrocytoma was seen in the patient who had received a diagnosis of anaplastic astrocytoma previously (Table 1). Microscopic examination (Fig. S1B) showed acute hypoxic injury in the cerebrum and cerebellum in all the patients, with loss of neurons in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellar Purkinje cell layer, but no thrombi or vasculitis. Rare foci of perivascular lymphocytes were detected in 2 brain specimens, and focal leptomeningeal inflammation was detected in 1 brain specimen. No microscopic abnormalities were observed in the olfactory bulbs or tracts (Fig. S2).
    Testing of brain tissue was performed with quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) for the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (techniques are described in the Materials and Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix). As shown in Table S3, for 2 patients, all 10 sections were tested, and for the remaining 16 patients, 2 sections were tested (1 from the frontal lobe and olfactory nerve and 1 from the medulla). The results were equivocal (defined as a viral load of <5.0 copies per cubic millimeter) in 5 of 10 brain sections from 1 patient and in 4 of 10 sections from another patient (Table S3); the remaining 11 sections obtained from these 2 patients were negative. In 32 sections obtained from the remaining 16 patients, 3 sections from the medulla and 3 sections from the frontal lobes and olfactory nerves were positive (5.0 to 59.4 copies per cubic millimeter); the results were equivocal in 20 sections and negative in 6 sections. The test results in relation to the interval between the onset of symptoms and death were inconsistent (Fig. S1).
    Immunohistochemical analysis (as described in the Supplementary Appendix) was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the same tissue blocks analyzed by qRT-PCR (in 52 blocks from 18 patients). There was no staining in the neurons, glia, endothelium, or immune cells. Nonspecific staining in the choroid plexus was observed in 8 sections obtained from 7 patients; however, this signal was present in negative control brains and did not correlate with the qRT-PCR results (Figs. S1 and S3). The tumor blocks obtained from the patient with anaplastic astrocytoma were not tested by qRT-PCR or immunohistochemical analysis to detect SARS-CoV-2.
    In conclusion, histopathological examination of brain specimens obtained from 18 patients who died 0 to 32 days after the onset of symptoms of Covid-19 showed only hypoxic changes and did not show encephalitis or other specific brain changes referable to the virus. There was no cytoplasmic viral staining on immunohistochemical analysis. The virus was detected at low levels in 6 brain sections obtained from 5 patients; these levels were not consistently related to the interval from the onset of symptoms to death. Positive tests may have been due to in situ virions or viral RNA from blood.
    Isaac H. Solomon, M.D., Ph.D.
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
    Erica Normandin, B.A.
    Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA
    Shamik Bhattacharyya, M.D.
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
    Shibani S. Mukerji, M.D., Ph.D.
    Kiana Keller, B.S.
    Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
    Ahya S. Ali, M.B., B.S.
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
    Gordon Adams, B.A.
    Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA
    Jason L. Hornick, M.D., Ph.D.
    Robert F. Padera, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
    Pardis Sabeti, M.D., D.Phil.
    Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA
    Supported by a grant (2U19AI110818, to Ms. Normandin and Dr. Sabeti) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), a grant (to Ms. Normandin and Dr. Sabeti) from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and a grant (K23MH115812, to Dr. Mukerji) from the NIH.
    Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.
    This letter was published on June 12, 2020, at NEJM.org.
    Dr. Solomon and Ms. Normandin contributed equally to this letter.

    Sunday, May 31, 2020

    Analysis of COVID-19 autopsies reveals many new details about this disease

    You'll have to hope that your medical staff knows about these anticoagulation strategies. 

    Analysis of COVID-19 autopsies reveals many new details about this disease

    MedicalXpress Breaking News-and-Events|May 29, 2020
    Pathologists at The Mount Sinai Hospital, at the epicenter of the COVID-19 global pandemic, have prepared one of the largest, most comprehensive analysis of autopsies of COVID-19 victims to date, revealing many complex new details about the disease. The analysis was released on the preprint server MedRxiv.
    "An essential contribution of pathology is the understanding of the biology of the disease and the range of organ damage, and for this reason, we decided to uncompromisingly perform as many autopsies as possible," said Carlos Cordon-Cardo, MD, PhD, Irene Heinz Given and John LaPorte Given Professor and Chair of the Lillian and Henry M. Stratton-Hans Popper Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, and co-author of the study.
    "Post-mortem examinations (autopsies) are the gold standard for the elucidation of the underlying pathophysiology of disease. Despite a rapidly growing body of literature focusing on the clinical impact and molecular microbiology of SARS-CoV-2, autopsy studies have comparatively been few and far between," said Mary Fowkes, MD, PhD, Director of the Autopsy Service, and senior author of the paper. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes COVID-19.
    To date, the team has performed more than 90 autopsies on deceased COVID-19 patients at The Mount Sinai Hospital. The published work analyzes the first 67. Gross anatomical findings were combined with the clinical history and laboratory data for all 67 patients. Microscopic examinations were carried out by the team, using special stains, immunochemistry, electron microscopy, and molecular pathology assays.
    COVID-19 was initially conceptualized as a primarily respiratory illness, but the Mount Sinai analysis laid out in detail that it also causes damage to the thin layer of cells that line blood vessels (endothelium), which underlies the clotting abnormalities and hypoxia observed in severely ill patients who develop multi-organ failure that leads to death in some patients.
    "The physical evidence we ascertained through our postmortem analyses helps elucidate the mechanisms behind some of the clinical symptoms observed by physicians treating COVID-19 patients, including thromboembolisms and neuropsychiatric disorders," says Clare Bryce, MBChB, Associate Professor of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, and, first author of the study.
    The lungs in nearly all cases showed diffuse damage to the alveoli, the small sacs where oxygen and carbon dioxide are exchanged with the blood. This damage is the typical microscopic evidence of clinical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with most cases showing fibrin (a fibrous, non-globular protein involved in the clotting of blood) and/or platelet thrombi, or clots, to varying extents. This same pathology is found in most cases of ARDS, including those related to other coronoaviruses. However, the totality of findings in the autopsy series as a whole, with blood clots in multiple other organ systems—most notably the brain, kidney, and liver—reflects endothelial damage as an underlying process, which would also correlate with the activation of the coagulation cascade and persistent elevation of blood markers of inflammation.
    The examined brains showed a surprising scarcity of inflammation, with only a few cases showing small foci of chronic inflammation. However, a surprising number of cases showed microthrombi with small and patchy evidence of tissue death caused by blockage of blood vessels in both peripheral and deep parts of the brain. These small microinfarcts may explain some of the psychological changes seen in some COVID-19 positive patients.
    This study brings new light into the pathophysiology of COVID-19, offering justification for novel treatment plans, including the anticoagulation strategies being put into effect by clinical leaders including Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD, Director of Mount Sinai Heart and Physician-in-Chief at The Mount Sinai Hospital.

    Wednesday, May 27, 2020

    Stroke Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Twice as Many Thrombectomies

    Do you really think your stroke hospital is giving prophylactic doses of Lovenox  as soon as a COVID-19 patient comes in? This is the reason I'm glad I'm taking a 325 daily aspirin and will demand either tPA or a Lovenox shot immediately. Because of this statement in other research;  

    Alveolar(lungs) capillary microthrombi were 9 times as prevalent in patients with Covid-19 as in patients with influenza. Because I want to prevent or blow out this clotting, but since I'm not medically trained you can't use this with your doctor.  

    Stroke Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Twice as Many Thrombectomies

    During the peak of the outbreak in Manhattan, Dr. Weinberger reported, “We’re doing twice as many interventions for large vessel thromboses than usual...”
    Stroke patients with disability, especially COVID-19 related large vessel strokes, deserve acute rehabilitation hospital care and should be referred to these specialty rehabilitation hospitals.”
    — Dr. Greg Vigna
    SANTA BARBARA, CA, UNITED STATES, May 26, 2020 /EINPresswire.com/ -- Dr. Jesse Weinberger, a stroke neurologist and member of a vascular interventional group that serves multiple hospitals in Manhattan, New York, a is director of the neurovascular laboratory at Mount Sinai states that during the COVID-19 pandemic, “We are also seeing…large vessel strokes…in folks who don’t have a good reason for it…and seeing many with multiple small infarcts, but we don’t find anything in the heart causing it.”
    During the peak of the outbreak in Manhattan, Dr. Weinberger reported, “We’re doing twice as many interventions for large vessel thromboses than usual, over 50% of which were on COVID-19 patients.”
    Greg Vigna, MD, JD, practicing Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation physician and national neurological injury attorney, and Certified Life Care Planner states, “COVID-19 has not changed much in terms of the stroke treatment plan as the major centers continue to provide thrombolytics (tPA or clot busters) if a ischemic stroke is identified within 6 hours of onset and thrombectomy is provided if large vessel occlusion is identified on CT-angiogram within 24 hours of onset. The goal is the same, decrease the time to thrombectomy as that leads to less disability.”
    Dr. Vigna adds, “Venous blood clots are also more common in COVID-19 patients especially in those who are critically ill and those with abnormalities on liver function test. Many hospitals have introduced policies to ensure that COVID-19 patients are given prophylactic doses of Lovenox, a blood thinner, to reduce the risk of deep venous thrombosis (blood clots) and pulmonary embolisms. Many questions remain with this novel virus because of the risk of large vessel strokes that are occurring in the young and the thrombogenic risk associated with COVID-19 infections. Should newly diagnosed COVID-19 young patients take a Baby Aspirin to prevent the risk of stroke? I don’t think anyone in the medical community is ready to say that without studies. The standard of care related to stroke care remains the same as prior to the pandemic. tPA administered within 4-6 hours of an acute stroke and thrombectomy, sooner the better, but must be within 24 hours.”
    Dr. Vigna concludes, “Interestingly, some acute rehabilitation hospitals are not taking COVID-19 patients because of the risk of viral shedding and infection control risks. Stroke patients with disability, especially COVID-19 related large vessel strokes, deserve acute rehabilitation hospital care and should not be transferred to a skilled nursing home and should be referred to these specialty rehabilitation hospitals.”
    Greg Vigna, MD, JD is a California and Washington DC lawyer who focuses on catastrophic neurological injuries cause by the vaginal mesh, brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, brachial plexus injuries, and medical malpractice. He is Board Certified in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
    https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/930457

    Acute Stroke Predicts Negative Outcome in COVID-19 Patients with Neuroimaging Findings

    Well, instead of excuses you have a lot of work to do to get these patients to only die at the standard rate of 1 in 8 strokes that are fatal within the first 30 days.  It is your responsibility to change that prediction rate. THAT IS WHAT LEADERS DO. They don't make excuses, they make plans to get better.  Are you a leader or a mouse? 

    The takeaway from this is don't have a stroke while having COVID-19.  If I have one I am going to immediately demand tPA, warfarin or a Lovenox shot. Because of this statement;

    Alveolar(lungs) capillary microthrombi were 9 times as prevalent in patients with Covid-19 as in patients with influenza.

    Because I want to prevent or blow out this clotting, but since I'm not medically trained you can't use this with your doctor. 

    Acute Stroke Predicts Negative Outcome in COVID-19 Patients with Neuroimaging Findings

    Half of hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients who have neuroimaging findings for acute stroke will die, according to newly published research.




    According to research published in the Journal of the Neurological Sciences, acute stroke is the most common neuroimaging finding in this patient group, but capturing the images can be complicated.
    “Our data demonstrates, for the first time, that when neuroimaging shows acute large ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke in admitted COVID-19 patients, it is one of the strongest prognostic markers of poor outcomes, even more than age and other previously reported co-morbidities, such as hypertension and obesity,” said lead study author Rajan Jain, M.D., neuroradiologist at NYU Langone Health. “COVID-19 patients who have a large ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke on imaging have a 50-percent mortality in the current study.”
    To determine the incidence and kind of neuroimaging findings present in this patient group, Jain’s team conducted a retrospective study of 3,218 patients who had a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis with the RT-PCR test who were admitted to three New York City hospitals between March 1 and April 13, 2020. Of the group, 454 patients (14.1 percent) underwent 716 neuroimaging studies – the number of studies accounted for 5.4 percent of 13,314 imaging exams of all types that were conducted on these patients during their entire hospitalization.
    Head CT was the most common study (81.8 percent), with other studies including head and nect CT angiography, CT perfusion, brain MRI, MRA/MRV, and spine MRI. Clinical indications prompting most neuroimaging included altered mental status or delirium, stroke, and mechanical fall or trauma.
    Among the overall patient group who underwent neuroimaging, 38 patients (8.4 percent) had acute neuroimaging findings. Based on study analysis, 14.1 percent of admitted COVID-19 patients underwent neuroimaging, accounting for 5.5 percent of total imaging studies. Of patients with positive neuroimaging studies, 92.5 percent had acute stroke, a finding that was present in 1.1 percent of COVID-19-postitive patients. For 63 percent of those patients positive for the virus with neuroimaging findings, signs of acute stroke were the initial COVID-19 manifestation.
    Although these findings offer important information about neuroimaging and COVID-19, the investigators said, obtaining the images could be difficult.
    “Neuroimaging studies have tended to constitute a larger percentage of overall diagnostic imaging use in hospital admitted patients,” they wrote. “However, COVID-19 being a pandemic associated primarily with pulmonary disease has led to the chest being the predominant [area] imaged.”
    Overall, they said, there are three reasons why gathering neuroimages can be harder in this environment. First(Excuses, excuses), they reported, the neurological complications, including delirium, encephalopathy, inflammatory neuropathy, and autonomic dysfunction, may not necessarily be associated with abnormalities seen on neuroimaging. Second(More excuses), patient isolation combined with the need for strict precautions and stringent disinfection protocols may have limited the ability to conduct detailed neurological exams, as well as neuroimaging, particularly MRI. Third(And still more excuses), critically ill patients are frequently intubated, making transport difficult and underdiagnosis possible. And, lastly, these patients are also often unconscious, making the identification of new neurological complications less likely.




    “Our study also highlights the fact there is restricted use of neuroimaging in COVID-19 patients due to multiple logistical constraints, including the severity of their illness and the concern of spread of infection by imaging,” the team wrote.

    Sunday, May 24, 2020

    Stroke rates among COVID-19 patients are low, but cases are more severe

    But if you were to extrapolate the damage seen in the micro-capillaries in lungs to the brain then this would be like the silent infarcts that kill off small parts of the brain.  So you need immediate prevention therapies to prevent that damage. 

    More evidence that Covid-19 is a disease of clotting

    This line from here is really concerning;

    Alveolar capillary microthrombi were 9 times as prevalent in patients with Covid-19 as in patients with influenza.

    Aspirin? warfarin? Lovenox? Don't listen to me, I'm not medically trained, so ask your doctor EXACTLY HOW TO PREVENT SUCH DAMAGE.  You'll need this before the additional research is completed. I would immediately tell my doctor to get warfarin going and get a Lovenox injection to cover the problem before the warfarin kicks in.

    The takeaway is don't get COVID-19.

    The latest here:

    Stroke rates among COVID-19 patients are low, but cases are more severe

    The rate of strokes in COVID-19 patients appears relatively low, but a higher proportion of those strokes are presenting in younger people and are often more severe compared to strokes in people who do not have the novel coronavirus, while globally rates for stroke hospitalizations and treatments are significantly lower than for the first part of 2019, according to four separate research papers published this week in Stroke, a journal of the American Stroke Association, a division of the American Heart Association.
    In "SARS2-CoV-2 and Stroke in a New York Healthcare System," researchers reported key demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who developed ischemic stroke associated with the COVID-19 infection and received care within one hospital system serving all five boroughs of New York City.
    During the study period of March 15 through April 19, 2020, out of 3,556 hospitalized patients with diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, 32 patients (0.9%) had imaging-proven ischemic stroke. They compared those 32 patients admitted with stroke and COVID-19 to those admitted only with stroke (46 patients) and found that the patients with COVID-19:
    • tended to be younger, average age of 63 years vs 70 years for non-COVID stroke patients;
    • had more severe strokes, average score of 19 vs 8 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale;
    • had higher D-dimer levels, 10,000 vs 525, which can indicate significant blood clotting;
    • were more likely to be treated with blood thinners, 75% vs 23.9%;
    • were more likely to have a cryptogenic stroke in which the cause is unknown, 65.6% vs 30.4%; and
    • were more likely to be dead at hospital discharge, 63.6% vs 9.3%.
    Conversely, COVID-19 stroke patients were less likely than those stroke patients without the novel coronavirus to have high blood pressure (56.3% vs 76.1%) or to have a prior history of stroke (3.1% vs 13%).
    The researchers observed that the rate of imaging-confirmed acute ischemic stroke in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in their New York City hospital system was lower compared to prior reports in COVID-19 studies from China. One reason for the difference might be related to variations in race/ethnicity between the two study populations. In addition, the low rate of ischemic stroke with COVID-19 infection may be an underestimate because "the diagnosis of ischemic stroke can be challenging in those critically ill with COVID-19 infection who are intubated and sedated," said lead study author Shadi Yaghi, MD, FAHA, of the department of neurology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine in Manhattan.
    Yaghi said, "It was difficult to determine the exact cause of the strokes of the COVID-19 patients, however, most patients appeared to experience abnormal blood clotting. Additional research is needed to determine if therapeutic anticoagulation(Aspirin? warfarin? Lovenox?) for stroke is useful in patients with COVID-19." The researchers noted that at least one clinical trial is already underway to investigate the safety and efficacy of treatment for active clotting vs preventive treatment in certain patients with COVID-19 infection presenting with possible clotting indicators.
    Yaghi and his coauthors also noted the number of stroke cases with COVID-19 seems to have peaked and is now decreasing. This finding may be related to the overall reduction in COVID-19 hospital admissions, which may be due to social distancing and guidance for people to stay at home. In addition, the number of stroke patients hospitalized during the study period was significantly lower than the same time frame in 2019.
    Similar trends are reported in several other studies also published this week in Stroke, reflecting a global disruption of emergency health care services including delayed care and a lower-than-usual volume of stroke emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.
    In a Hong Kong study, "Delays in Stroke Onset to Hospital Arrival Time during COVID-19," by lead author Kay Cheong Teo, MBBS, researchers compared the stroke onset time to hospital arrival time for stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients from January 23 to March 24, 2020 (the first 60 days from the first diagnosed COVID-19 case in Hong Kong) to the same time period in 2019. In 2020, 73 stroke patients presented to Queen Mary Hospital compared to 83 in 2019. However, the time from stroke onset-to-arrival time was about an hour longer in 2020 compared with last year (154 minutes vs 95 minutes). In addition, the number of patients arriving within the critical 4.5-hour treatment window dropped from 72% in 2019 to 55% in 2020.
    Also from China, "The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on stroke care and potential solutions," by lead author Jing Zhao, MD, PhD, detailed survey results from more than 200 stroke centers through the Big Data Observatory Platform for Stroke of China, which consists of 280 hospitals across China. They found that in February 2020, hospital admissions related to stroke dropped nearly 40%, while clot-busting treatment and mechanical clot-removal cases also decreased by 25%, compared to the same time period in 2019. The researchers cited several factors likely contributed to the reduced admissions and prehospital delays during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as lack of stroke knowledge and proper transportation. They also noted that another key factor was patients not coming to the hospital for fear of virus infection.
    In a fourth study, "Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak," by lead author Basile Kerleroux, MD, researchers in France compared patient data from stroke centers across the country from February 15 through March 30, 2020 to data of patients treated during the same time period in 2019. They found a 21% decrease (844 in 2019 vs. 668 in 2020) in overall volume of ischemic patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy during the pandemic compared to the previous year.
    Additionally, there was a significant increase in the amount of time from imaging to treatment overall--145 minutes in 2020 compared to 126 minutes in 2019, and that delay increased by nearly 30 minutes in patients transferred to other facilities for treatment after imaging. The researchers said delays may have been due to unprecedented stress on emergency medical system services, as well as primary care stroke centers lacking transfer resources needed to send eligible patients to thrombectomy capable stroke centers within the therapeutic window. They noted stricter applications of guidelines during the pandemic period could also have meant some patients may have not been referred or accepted for mechanical thrombectomy treatment during that time.